Inflation and “Price Stability”

We still remember when sometime in the mid 1980s, the German Bundesbank proudly pointed to the fact that Germany’s y/y consumer price inflation rate had declined to zero. It was considered a “mission accomplished” moment. No-one mentioned that economic nirvana would remain out of sight unless price inflation was pushed to 2% per year.


CPI, annual rate of change. During the “stagflation” period of the 1970s, Congress enacted the Federal Reserve Reform Act and the Humphrey-Hawkins Act, which specified a list of miracles the Fed was supposed to perform.


The Federal Reserve Reform Act of 1977, which established the famous dual mandate, inter alia tasked the Fed with maintaining “stable prices”. It did not define price stability as perpetual debasement at some arbitrary rate. The Humphrey-Hawkins Act was adopted one year later and supplied precise definitions, goals and time tables. With respect to CPI, it stipulated that inflation was to reach 3% or less by 1984 and zero percent by 1988.

Not five, not four, not three, definitely not two or even one percent, but zero percent (the holy hand grenade of Antioch user manual illustrates that low single digit counting exercises sometimes require precise instructions).

We must interpose here that the pursuit of the elusive goal of price stability is impossible in any case and actually downright dangerous. For one thing, the so-called “general price level” does not exist. This does not mean that the purchasing power of money does not exist – it clearly does – but it cannot be quantified.

The biggest (and far from the only) problem is that there exists no constant that can be used for the purpose of measurement. Money and the goods and services it can be exchanged for are both subject to the forces of supply and demand – there is no fixed, unchanging quantity in sight anywhere.

Let us concede for argument’s sake that observing the prices of a fixed basket of goods over time can provide a rough idea on the evolution of “price inflation”. For reasons that have never been cogently explained, central bankers have changed their view of what constitutes price stability since the 1980s. These days they claim that an annual CPI inflation rate of 2% represents “price stability”.

Apart from this slightly Orwellian redefinition of stable prices, neither economic theory nor empirical evidence lend support to the idea that debasing money at this designated pace will foster wealth creation and economic growth. On the contrary, empirical evidence suggests the opposite.

For instance, under the gold standard that was in force during the so-called “Gilded Age”, consumer prices were actually in a mild downtrend. And yet, real economic output per capita in the US grew at a pace of more than 5% per year. Such growth rates have never been seen again since.


US real economic growth per capita during the Gilded Age – the four decades before the establishment of the Fed, when a gold standard prevailed and prices were actually in a mild downtrend.


The Gilded Age was blessed with the absence of a central bank and government spending that fluctuated between a barely noticeable 2 to 4 percent of GDP. Government was essentially a footnote in most people’s lives.


The Dangers of Pursuing Price Stability

In a progressing unhampered market economy prices should decline over time. After all, economic progress is characterized by growing productivity. Price trends should reflect the extent to which productivity growth exceeds money supply growth – which it generally does if gold is used as the genereal medium of exchange.

This effect can even be observed in today’s inflationary fiat money system, namely in industries exhibting extraordinarily strong productivity growth. It can also be seen that one of the arguments occasionally cited in support of deliberate monetary debasement – namely that consumers would delay purchases if prices were to fall – is clearly wrong.

The prices of computers, smart phones and countless other electronic gadgets have declined rapidly for many years – and yet, the industries producing such items are clearly thriving. In fact, their growth rates are generally stronger than those of other sectors. Computers have inter alia revolutionized manufacturing methods, and for quite a while productivity growth has accelerated economy-wide as a result (in recent years the effect may have begun to dissipate).


All economic central planning agencies are ultimately groping in the dark…


If central planners want to keep prices “stable” in such an environment, they have to push up the rate of money supply growth – which in turn requires suppressing interest rates and/or “unconventional” policies such as QE (i.e., outright money printing).

This will lead to the previously mentioned distortion of relative prices (see Part 2), and all the consequences it entails. The effects are inter alia visible in the form of recurring  bubbles in  financial assets and rapid growth in debt levels. However, money printing does not create one iota of real capital – it merely leads to its mispricing and misallocation.

The boom conditions accompanying an artificially induced credit and money supply expansion are therefore never sustainable. A bust will always follow, and usually the bust is a mirror image of the boom that preceded it. In a capitalist market economy there will still be net wealth creation over time, but the more often artificial booms are induced, the greater the structural damage to the economy will be.

This probably explains at least partly why economic expansions have become steadily weaker in the course of the post-war era. It also implies that the amplitude of boom-bust cycles will tend to increase – a phenomenon that could indeed be observed in recent decades.

The conclusion from this is that the price stability policy pursued by central banks is not a boon – on the contrary, it is a threat to wealth creation and prosperity.


Charts by St. Louis Fed, wikipedia




Emigrate While You Can... Learn More




Dear Readers!

You may have noticed that our so-called “semiannual” funding drive, which started sometime in the summer if memory serves, has seamlessly segued into the winter. In fact, the year is almost over! We assure you this is not merely evidence of our chutzpa; rather, it is indicative of the fact that ad income still needs to be supplemented in order to support upkeep of the site. Naturally, the traditional benefits that can be spontaneously triggered by donations to this site remain operative regardless of the season - ranging from a boost to general well-being/happiness (inter alia featuring improved sleep & appetite), children including you in their songs, up to the likely allotment of privileges in the afterlife, etc., etc., but the Christmas season is probably an especially propitious time to cross our palms with silver. A special thank you to all readers who have already chipped in, your generosity is greatly appreciated. Regardless of that, we are honored by everybody's readership and hope we have managed to add a little value to your life.


Bitcoin address: 12vB2LeWQNjWh59tyfWw23ySqJ9kTfJifA


One Response to “The Weird Obsessions of Central Bankers, Part 3”

  • Kreditanstalt:

    They DO love to quantify absolutely everything…it’s in the nature of Central Planners, who see themselves, their role, their activities and credentials as “SCIENCE”.

    The derivation of this strange belief – that “economics” is a “science”, with iron laws and unbreakable truths – goes back, I think, to the “Progressive Era” of the period ca. 1900-1920 and to the early 1930s “technocracy” and social movement-inspired efforts to defeat the Depression.

Your comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Most read in the last 20 days:

  • Is the Fed Secretly Bailing Out a Major Bank?
      Prettifying Toxic Waste The promise of something for nothing is always an enticing proposition. Who doesn’t want roses without thorns, rainbows without rain, and salvation without repentance?  So, too, who doesn’t want a few extra basis points of yield above the 10-year Treasury note at no added risk?   The yield-chasing hamster wheel... [PT]   Thus, smart fellows go after it; pursuing financial innovation with unyielding devotion.  The underlying...
  • Japan's Yield Curve Control Regime is Coming to America
      Monetary Lunacy, Nipponese Version Earlier this month, Bank of Japan (BOJ) Governor Haruhiko Kuroda commented that Japan’s central planners are considering a 50-year government bond issue as a long-term means of putting a floor under super-long interest rates.  How this floor would be placed is extremely suspect; we will have more on this in a moment.  But first, the dual benefits – according to Japan’s central planners...   Kuroda-san: the man with a plan, or...
  • Gold, Togas and Very Fine Suits - Precious Metals Supply and Demand
      Yields and the “Everything Bubble” Last week the price of gold was up $9, and the price of silver was up $0.18. This week, our thought turns to a cherished old saw. Gold bugs often tell us that the purchasing power of gold is constant. An ounce of gold could have purchased, they say, a fine toga in Roman times. Just as it could buy a fine suit today.   This magnificent toga will set you back an ounce, pilgrim. Just think of the impression you'll make....
  • Repo Market, QE4 (a.k.a. Not QE), the Fed and Gold
      Incrementum Advisory Board Discussion of 23 Oct 2019 In late October the Advisory Board of the Incrementum Fund held its quarterly meeting (a transcript is available for download at the end of this post). This time the board was joined by special guest Dan Oliver, the manager of Myrmikan Capital and president of the Committee for Monetary Research & Education.  Myrmikan inter alia publishes excellent and quite original research on gold which we hereby highly...
  • Eating the Seed Corn - Precious Metals Supply and Demand
      Misguided Incentives The price of gold subsided a few bucks, and the price of silver blipped a few pennies. Not much action last week, groceries neither pumped into nor drained out of this asset class. Those who look to exchange capital goods for groceries need to find a different asset.   The best-laid plans... [PT]   Not even the S&P 500 Index provided a gain in groceries this week. It certainly wasn’t the much-vaunted store of groceries, Bitcoin, which...
  • The Fed’s Answer to the Ghastly Monster of its Creation
      The Bubble Machine The launch angle of the U.S. stock market over the past decade has been steep and relentless. The S&P 500, after bottoming out at 666 on March 6, 2009, has rocketed up over 370 percent. New highs continue to be reached practically every day.   S&P 500 weekly, since the low of 2009. A party of roaring 20s proportion in terms of duration, extent and end point valuations (a post-war inflation episode triggered a devastating bear market from November...
  • The Credit Market Powder Keg
      Credit Market Bifurcation By all accounts, credit markets remain on fire. 2019 is already a record year for corporate bond issuance, beating the previous record set in 2017 by a sizable margin. Demand for the debt of governments and government-related issuers remains extremely strong as well, despite non-existent and often even negative issuance yields. Even now, with economic activity clearly slowing and numerous  threats to the post-GFC recovery looming on the horizon, the occasional...
  • Gold Moves from Vault A to Vault B - Precious Metals Supply and Demand
      Poland's Gold and the Conspiracy Theorists The price of gold was up enough to buy a bottle of Two Buck Chuck wine, and the price of silver was up enough to buy a wooden nickel (well, not enough to buy a real nickel nickel).   Poland's gold bars are packaged by employees of G4S International Logistics to be transported from London to Poland. Poland's gold was originally transferred to London at the beginning of WW II, when Stalin and Hitler invaded and partitioned the country...

Support Acting Man

Austrian Theory and Investment


The Review Insider


Dog Blow

THE GOLD CARTEL: Government Intervention on Gold, the Mega Bubble in Paper and What This Means for Your Future

Realtime Charts


Gold in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from]



Gold in EUR:

[Most Recent Quotes from]



Silver in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from]



Platinum in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from]



USD - Index:

[Most Recent USD from]


Mish Talk

Buy Silver Now!
Buy Gold Now!