One Great Big Difference

On a beautiful midsummer day, roughly six months ago, two distinguished men, of distinguished stature, crossed paths under precarious circumstances.  They are very much alike, these two distinguished men.

 

Let’s confuse him…  [PT]

 

Both are men of enormous ego.  Both are filled with ambitious delusions for the future.  Both are masters of persuasion.  Both offer a cause and conviction people can rally behind.

Both deliver frequent promises of greatness.  Both hold up historical allusions of eminence, and do so with confidence and flair.  Both claim destiny is on their side.

Does one read The Wall Street Journal?  Does one not?  We don’t know.

But we do know there’s one great big significant difference between these two men.  A difference far beyond either of their control.

One has an eye to the past, and a futile desire to return to greatness.  The other has an eye to the future, and a burning ambition to own it.  The difference, in other words, is that between descent and ascent.  And the intersection of this difference is a natural point of conflict.

As one star falls and one star rises, their two paths inevitably cross.  There’s no way around it.  Once the rendezvous has been made, there’s no turning back.

 

The First Day of the War

On July 6, 2018, if you recall, the first of President Trump’s trade tariffs with China took effect.  These included a 25 percent tariff on $34 billion of Chinese goods entering the United States.  Chinese President Xi Jinping quickly countered with retaliatory tariffs on U.S. soybeans and automobiles.

Billionaire investor Ray Dalio commemorated the exchange by tweeting:

 

Today is the first day of the war with China.” 

 

Was Dalio exercising hyperbole?  Was he being starkly somber?  Perhaps he was merely recognizing that a trade war can lead to a fighting war… should Trump and Jinping push hard enough.

 

Lettuce hope this is not where this is going…  [PT]

 

Roughly a year ago, President Trump commented that, “trade wars are good, and easy to win.”  So far the trade war has been more bark than bite.  Several additional rounds of tariffs were imposed or threatened, following the first day of the war.

Then, over dinner at the G20 Buenos Aires summit, Trump and Jinping agreed to delay planned tariff increases for 90 days, from December 1, 2018. Presently, the 90 day negotiation period is halfway over.  Yet, as far as we can tell, little progress has been made in reaching a new trade agreement.

Moreover, should no resolution be reached by March 1, 2019, tariffs of 25 percent will be imposed on $200 billion of Chinese goods.

But what then?  Will more tariffs bring about a glorious triumph for Trump? Here at the Economic Prism we have some reservations.  Namely, that the desired result – some sort of economic victory – is unattainable.  That after damaging business and trade there will be no clear conclusion.

At the moment, however, Trump appears to have some leverage over Jinping.  Though this is more by dumb luck than by skill or aptitude…

 

Maybe flattery will work…  [PT]

Cartoon by Jeff Danziger / Rutland Herald

 

Kicking Xi Jinping While He’s Down

Reports out of China this week are of an economy that’s slowing.  In fact, China’s December exports fell 4.4 percent year-on-year.  At the same time, China’s December imports fell 7.6 percent over this same period.

Are Trump’s trade policies responsible for China’s slowing economy?  Or is it merely a coincident?  Maybe China’s economy’s slowing because two decades of debt financed growth have erected an economy that is highly unstable.  Here Bloomberg offers some thoughts:

 

“A trade pact, if it happens, may soothe investors, and perhaps even juice economic growth—at least temporarily.  But it won’t bring an end to China’s woes.  While tariffs are a nuisance, the real problems run deeper, embedded in China’s financial structure.

“What goes widely unnoticed is that China is already in crisis.  No, it’s not the sort of hold-on-for-dear-life collapse the U.S. had in 2008 or the surprising, ferocious meltdowns the Asian Tiger economies experienced in 1997.  Nonetheless, it’s a crisis, complete with gutted banks, bankrupt companies, and state bailouts.  Since the Chinese distinguish their model of state capitalism as ‘socialism with Chinese characteristics,’ let’s call this a ‘financial crisis with Chinese attributes.’

“This crisis is not merely about the current slowdown in growth.  It’s been going on for a while, and by the looks of it, isn’t going away anytime soon.  How it’s resolved—or isn’t—will have repercussions much bigger than a few quarters of poor growth performance.  This crisis is about China’s economic future and whether or not it can manage the structural transformation necessary to propel the economy into the ranks of the world’s most advanced.  And it also will determine if China will be a pillar of global growth—or a threat to the world’s financial stability.”

 

Both narrow and broad money supply growth rates in China have collapsed to the lowest levels in at least twenty years. This is putting pressure on economic activity in the country. [PT]

 

As President, Trump has a successful track record of always kicking a man while he’s down.  Without question, as part of the trade negotiations, he’ll give Jinping several extra kicks while he can.  In doing so, and as the U.S. economy also slows, he’ll push the trade war ever closer to a real war.

 

Chart by: St. Louis Fed

 

Chart and image captions by PT

 

MN Gordon is President and Founder of Direct Expressions LLC, an independent publishing company. He is the Editorial Director and Publisher of the Economic Prism – an E-Newsletter that tries to bring clarity to the muddy waters of economic policy and discusses interesting investment opportunities.

 

 

 

Emigrate While You Can... Learn More

 


 

 
 

Dear Readers!

You may have noticed that our so-called “semiannual” funding drive, which started sometime in the summer if memory serves, has seamlessly segued into the winter. In fact, the year is almost over! We assure you this is not merely evidence of our chutzpa; rather, it is indicative of the fact that ad income still needs to be supplemented in order to support upkeep of the site. Naturally, the traditional benefits that can be spontaneously triggered by donations to this site remain operative regardless of the season - ranging from a boost to general well-being/happiness (inter alia featuring improved sleep & appetite), children including you in their songs, up to the likely allotment of privileges in the afterlife, etc., etc., but the Christmas season is probably an especially propitious time to cross our palms with silver. A special thank you to all readers who have already chipped in, your generosity is greatly appreciated. Regardless of that, we are honored by everybody's readership and hope we have managed to add a little value to your life.

   

Bitcoin address: 12vB2LeWQNjWh59tyfWw23ySqJ9kTfJifA

   
 

3 Responses to “Kicking Xi Jinping While He’s Down”

  • Hans:

    The Donald man caved; with Chicoms
    we will see Cave II, the Gold Edition. The trade
    agreements with both Oh! Canada and Old Mexico
    were nothing but a rendition of Romper Room.

    I am a supporter of his but rather than carrying
    a big stick, he has only a bigly mouth.

    A Trump hater was just anointed as envoy to
    Caracas !! The opposition party are just more
    Socshevkes. His director of personnel must be
    The Ronald McDonald House or 1-800-Get-Junk.

    I am losing confidence in his abilities to restructure
    the nation’s failed polices.

    I was not sure whether to short or long the market,
    but the Commie Xi is going to turn The Donald into
    fried rice. Investors, long the market because a recession
    or a bear market is the end of The Trumpster.

  • Hans:

    “Kicking Xi Jinping While He’s Down”

    Mr Gordon, you don’t think the Commie Xi would do the
    same? Please.

    Hear, is what is going to happen.

    https://slopeofhope.com/2019/01/the-china-deal-by-binkius-hippo.html

Your comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Most read in the last 20 days:

  • As the Madness Turns
      A Growing Gap The first quarter of 2019 is over and done.  But before we say good riddance.  Some reflection is in order.  To this we offer two discrete metrics.  Gross domestic product and government debt.   US nominal GDP vs total federal debt (in millions of USD) – government debt has exceeded  total economic output for the first time in Q4 2012 and since then its relative growth trajectory has increased – and it seems the gap is set to widen further....
  • Bitcoin Jumps as Ordered -  Precious Metals Supply and Demand
      Digital Asset Rush The only part of our April Fools article yesterday that was not said with tongue firmly planted in cheek was the gold and silver price action (though framed it in the common dollar-centric parlance, being April Fools):   “Gold went down $21, while silver dropped about 1/3 of a dollar. Not quite a heavy metal brick in free fall, but close enough.”   Bitcoin, hourly – a sudden yen for BTC breaks out among the punters. [PT]   It also...
  • A Trip Down Memory Lane – 1928-1929 vs. 2018-2019
      Boom Times Compared It has become abundantly clear by now that the late 2018 swoon was not yet the beginning of the end of the stock market bubble – at least not right away. While money supply growth continues to decelerate, the technical underpinnings of the rally from the late December low were actually quite strong – in particular, new highs in the cumulative NYSE A/D line indicate that it was broad-based.   Cumulative NYSE A/D line vs. SPX – normally the A/D line...
  • Debt Growth and Capital Consumption - Precious Metals Supply and Demand
      A Worrisome Trend If you read gold analysis much, you will come across two ideas. One, inflation so-called (rising consumer prices) is not only running much higher than the official statistic, but is about to really start skyrocketing. Two, buy gold because gold will hedge it. That is, the price of gold will go up as fast, or faster, than the price of gold.   CPI monthly since 1914, annualized rate of change. In recent years CPI was relatively tame despite a vast increase in the...
  • Unsolicited Advice to Fed Chair Powell
      Unsolicited Advice to Fed Chair Powell American businesses over the past decade have taken a most unsettling turn.  According to research from the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, as of November 2018, non-financial corporate debt has grown to more than $9.1 trillion [ed note: this number refers to securitized debt and business loans, other corporate liabilities would add an additional $11 trillion for a total of $20.5 trillion].   US non-financial corporate...
  • Long Term Stock Market Sentiment Remains as Lopsided as Ever 
      Investors are Oblivious to the Market's Downside Potential This is a brief update on a number of sentiment/positioning indicators we have frequently discussed in these pages in the past. In this missive our focus is exclusively on indicators that are of medium to long-term relevance to prospective stock market returns. Such indicators are not really useful for the purpose of market timing -  instead they are telling us something about the likely duration and severity of the bust that...
  • The Effect of Earnings Season on Seasonal Price Patterns
      Earnings Lottery Shareholders are are probably asking themselves every quarter how the earnings of companies in their portfolios will turn out. Whether they will beat or miss analyst expectations often seems akin to a lottery.   The beatings will continue until morale improves... [PT]   However, what is not akin to a lottery are the seasonal trends of corporate earnings and stock prices. Thus breweries will usually report stronger quarterly earnings after the...
  • The Liquidity Drought Gets Worse
      Money Supply Growth Continues to Falter Ostensibly the stock market has rallied because the Fed promised to maintain an easy monetary policy. To be sure, interest rate hikes have been put on hold for the time being and the balance sheet contraction (a.k.a.“quantitative tightening”) will be terminated much earlier than originally envisaged. And yet, the year-on-year growth rate of the true broad money supply keeps declining noticeably.   The year-on-year growth rates of...
  • The Gold-Silver Ratio Continues to Rise - Precious Metals Supply and Demand
      Is Silver Hard of Hearing? The price of gold inched down, but the price of silver footed down (if we may be permitted a little humor that may not make sense to metric system people). For the gold-silver ratio to be this high, it means one of two things. It could be that speculators are avoiding the monetary metals and metal stackers are depressed. Or that something is going on in the economy, to drive demand for the metals in different directions.   As a rule the gold silver...
  • What Were They Thinking?
      Learning From Other People's Mistakes is Cheaper One benefit of hindsight is that it imparts a cheap superiority over the past blunders of others.  We certainly make more mistakes than we’d care to admit.  Why not look down our nose and acquire some lessons learned from the mistakes of others?   Bitcoin, weekly. The late 2017 peak is completely obvious in hindsight... [PT]   A simple record of the collective delusions from the past can be quickly garnered from...

Support Acting Man

Item Guides

Austrian Theory and Investment

j9TJzzN

The Review Insider

Archive

Dog Blow

350x200

THE GOLD CARTEL: Government Intervention on Gold, the Mega Bubble in Paper and What This Means for Your Future

Realtime Charts

 

Gold in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Gold in EUR:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Silver in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Platinum in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

USD - Index:

[Most Recent USD from www.kitco.com]

 

Mish Talk

 
Buy Silver Now!
 
Buy Gold Now!