Shifts in Credit-Land: Repatriation Hurts Small Corporate Borrowers

A recent Bloomberg article informs us that US companies with large cash hoards (such as AAPL and ORCL) were sizable players in corporate debt markets, supplying plenty of funds to borrowers in need of US dollars. Ever since US tax cuts have prompted repatriation flows, a “$300 billion-per-year hole” has been left in the market, as Bloomberg puts it. The chart below depicts the situation as of the end of August (not much has changed since then).

 

Short term (1-3 year) yields have risen strongly as a handful of cash-rich tech companies have begun to repatriate funds to the US.

 

Now these borrowers find it harder to get hold of funding. This in turn is putting additional pressure on their borrowing costs. At the same time, the cash-rich companies no longer need to fund share buybacks and dividends by issuing bonds themselves.

The upshot is that the financially strongest companies no longer issue new short term debt, while smaller and financially weaker companies are scrambling for funding and are faced with soaring interest rate expenses – which makes them even weaker.

As Bloomberg writes:

 

“Once the biggest buyers of short-dated corporate debt, Apple along with 20 other cash-rich companies including Microsoft Corp. and Oracle Corp. have turned into sellers. While they once bought $25 billion of debt per quarter, they’re now selling in $50 billion clips, leaving a $300 billion-a-year hole in the market, according to data tracked by Bank of America Corp. strategists.

The reversal is adding pressure to a market already buffeted by Federal Reserve rate hikes. Yields on corporate bonds with maturities between one and three years have jumped 0.83 percentage point this year to 3.19 percent, close to the highest in almost eight years, Bloomberg Barclays index data show. That increase has happened at a faster pace than longer-dated bonds, which tech companies bought less frequently.”

 

What is really noteworthy about this is that as these corporate middlemen are getting out, the quality of fixed-rate securities available to the rest of the investoriat continues to deteriorate in the aggregate.

 

Risk Perceptions vs. Risk

Meanwhile, despite the fact that euro-denominated corporate debt is reportedly still selling like hot cakes, both spreads and absolute yields have increased markedly in euro as well since late 2017 (as yields on German government debt are used as sovereign benchmarks for the euro area and remain stubbornly low, credit spreads on corporate and financial debt have increased almost in tandem with nominal yields).

Euro area yields are mainly of interest to us because they were leading to the downside (driven by the ECB’s QE program) and may now be leading in the other direction as well.

Consider the following charts. The first two show spreads and nominal yields on the ICE BofA-ML Euro High Yield Index. While the spread is back to levels last seen in mid April 2017, effective yields are at levels last seen in late 2016 – about 20 months ago.

Since late June, spreads and yields have essentially moved sideways, which has apparently alleviated any concerns the markets may have had when they spiked initially. Unfortunately for the unconcerned herd, these charts look rather bullish. In other words, it seems as though yields are just consolidating before the next major leg up.

We have a nagging suspicion that this next move will see spreads move up faster than effective yields. As we point out in the chart annotation, for borrowers it is the effective yield they must pay that is relevant, not how it compares to sovereign benchmarks. Spreads only tell us what current risk perceptions are.

Keep in mind that risk perceptions are not the same as risk itself. There is a feedback loop between the two, as low risk perceptions permit borrowers of dubious creditworthiness to roll over maturing debt with ease. It should be clear though that the virtuous cycle that has compressed both spreads and yields to such low levels can rapidly (and quite easily) turn into a vicious cycle.

 

European high-yield spreads and effective yields. The cost of corporate debt is still far from alarming levels, but quite a bit of debt was issued at much lower yields, as annual issuance volume has reached one record high after another.

 

Where the Biggest Danger Lurks

Interestingly, it is actually not the junk bond market that harbors the greatest dangers for investors, at least not directly. Rather, it is the section of the investment grade segment of the market that is rated precisely one notch above junk – the BBB-rated universe.

 

According to a report by PIMCO from January, the net leverage of BBB-rated non-financial companies has surged from 1.7 to almost 3 between 2000 and 2017 (net leverage = net debt/EBITDA ratio, which indicates how many years it would take a company to repay its debt out of its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation & amortization). In other words, today’s BBB-rated companies are definitely not as bulletproof as BBB-rated companies once used to be. Call it a “sign of the times”.

 

BBB-rated issuers have seen their effective yields rise to levels last seen more than 31 months ago. At the time junk bond spreads and yields were just coming off a major peak established during the oil patch scare of late 2014 to early 2016. On a relative basis, debtors in this market segment are clearly facing the greatest problem in terms of rising borrowing costs.

 

But that is far from the only thing that is of concern in this context. The investment grade corporate bond segment is quite large – and BBB-rated bonds actually represent almost 50% of the total these days (!). No other market segment has seen comparable growth in issuance. Here is a chart from PPM America showing the details:

 

BBB-rated corporate bond issuance has grown to such an extent that these bonds represent nearly 50% of the investment-grade universe these days. At the same time the leverage of BBB-rated issuers has soared.

 

We want to draw your attention to the last time the percentage of BBB-rated bonds almost surged to current levels. The difference between then and now reveals a very important point.

From 2001-2003 the percentage of BBB-rated corporate bonds increased sharply due to a recession in which corporate debt was the hardest hit segment of the credit markets. Enormous amounts of capital malinvestment (particularly  in the tech sector) had to be liquidated at the time. The ensuing wave of credit rating downgrades was responsible for pushing up the percentage of BBB-rated bonds.

This time, the percentage of BBB-rated bonds in the investment grade universe has soared during a boom rather than a bust. This was inter alia driven by M&A-related issuance, but it would probably be better to simply state that it was (and still is) mainly driven by loose monetary policy and the associated “hunt for yield”.

Here is another chart via Credit Sights that illustrates the situation quite vividly – it compares the face value of outstanding BBB-rated with that of BB-rated non-financial corporate bonds. Note the spike in BBB-rated bond issuance in the era of QE and ZIRP right after the “great financial crisis”:

 

The amount of BBB-rated compared to higher quality BB-rated bond issuance has soared.

 

In other words, the aggregate quality of corporate bonds held by investors has deteriorated enormously in recent years. Consider now what is going to happen in the next economic downturn. This time the main impact won’t consist of downgrades of higher rated investment grade (IG) bonds to the lowest IG level of BBB – this time it will consist of downgrades of BBB-rated bonds into junk bond territory.

Since BBB is the lowest IG rating, a downgrade automatically boots the bonds concerned into junk-bond land. Countless tracking indexes and passive investment vehicles exist these days which reflect certain rating buckets. Bonds which are downgraded from investment grade to high yield status are instantaneously removed from IG indexes.

ETFs dedicated to buying and holding investment grade bonds and fund managers whose investments track these bond indexes will become forced sellers – at a time when there will likely be a noticeable paucity of bids for junk bonds. Keep in mind that commercial banks are no longer making markets in corporate bonds either, as they had to abandon proprietary trading due to new regulations that were supposed to make the financial system “safer”.

 

Conclusion

The liquidity to stop this eventual deluge simply won’t be there when push comes to shove. Current risk perceptions are definitely not reflecting the actual risks extant in credit markets. And no, this time it will not be different.

 

Charts by Bloomberg, St. Louis Fed, PPM America, Credit Sights

 

 

 

Emigrate While You Can... Learn More

 


 

 
 

Dear Readers!

You may have noticed that our so-called “semiannual” funding drive, which started sometime in the summer if memory serves, has seamlessly segued into the winter. In fact, the year is almost over! We assure you this is not merely evidence of our chutzpa; rather, it is indicative of the fact that ad income still needs to be supplemented in order to support upkeep of the site. Naturally, the traditional benefits that can be spontaneously triggered by donations to this site remain operative regardless of the season - ranging from a boost to general well-being/happiness (inter alia featuring improved sleep & appetite), children including you in their songs, up to the likely allotment of privileges in the afterlife, etc., etc., but the Christmas season is probably an especially propitious time to cross our palms with silver. A special thank you to all readers who have already chipped in, your generosity is greatly appreciated. Regardless of that, we are honored by everybody's readership and hope we have managed to add a little value to your life.

   

Bitcoin address: 12vB2LeWQNjWh59tyfWw23ySqJ9kTfJifA

   
 

Your comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Most read in the last 20 days:

  • As the Madness Turns
      A Growing Gap The first quarter of 2019 is over and done.  But before we say good riddance.  Some reflection is in order.  To this we offer two discrete metrics.  Gross domestic product and government debt.   US nominal GDP vs total federal debt (in millions of USD) – government debt has exceeded  total economic output for the first time in Q4 2012 and since then its relative growth trajectory has increased – and it seems the gap is set to widen further....
  • Bitcoin Jumps as Ordered -  Precious Metals Supply and Demand
      Digital Asset Rush The only part of our April Fools article yesterday that was not said with tongue firmly planted in cheek was the gold and silver price action (though framed it in the common dollar-centric parlance, being April Fools):   “Gold went down $21, while silver dropped about 1/3 of a dollar. Not quite a heavy metal brick in free fall, but close enough.”   Bitcoin, hourly – a sudden yen for BTC breaks out among the punters. [PT]   It also...
  • A Trip Down Memory Lane – 1928-1929 vs. 2018-2019
      Boom Times Compared It has become abundantly clear by now that the late 2018 swoon was not yet the beginning of the end of the stock market bubble – at least not right away. While money supply growth continues to decelerate, the technical underpinnings of the rally from the late December low were actually quite strong – in particular, new highs in the cumulative NYSE A/D line indicate that it was broad-based.   Cumulative NYSE A/D line vs. SPX – normally the A/D line...
  • Debt Growth and Capital Consumption - Precious Metals Supply and Demand
      A Worrisome Trend If you read gold analysis much, you will come across two ideas. One, inflation so-called (rising consumer prices) is not only running much higher than the official statistic, but is about to really start skyrocketing. Two, buy gold because gold will hedge it. That is, the price of gold will go up as fast, or faster, than the price of gold.   CPI monthly since 1914, annualized rate of change. In recent years CPI was relatively tame despite a vast increase in the...
  • Unsolicited Advice to Fed Chair Powell
      Unsolicited Advice to Fed Chair Powell American businesses over the past decade have taken a most unsettling turn.  According to research from the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, as of November 2018, non-financial corporate debt has grown to more than $9.1 trillion [ed note: this number refers to securitized debt and business loans, other corporate liabilities would add an additional $11 trillion for a total of $20.5 trillion].   US non-financial corporate...
  • Long Term Stock Market Sentiment Remains as Lopsided as Ever 
      Investors are Oblivious to the Market's Downside Potential This is a brief update on a number of sentiment/positioning indicators we have frequently discussed in these pages in the past. In this missive our focus is exclusively on indicators that are of medium to long-term relevance to prospective stock market returns. Such indicators are not really useful for the purpose of market timing -  instead they are telling us something about the likely duration and severity of the bust that...
  • The Liquidity Drought Gets Worse
      Money Supply Growth Continues to Falter Ostensibly the stock market has rallied because the Fed promised to maintain an easy monetary policy. To be sure, interest rate hikes have been put on hold for the time being and the balance sheet contraction (a.k.a.“quantitative tightening”) will be terminated much earlier than originally envisaged. And yet, the year-on-year growth rate of the true broad money supply keeps declining noticeably.   The year-on-year growth rates of...
  • The Effect of Earnings Season on Seasonal Price Patterns
      Earnings Lottery Shareholders are are probably asking themselves every quarter how the earnings of companies in their portfolios will turn out. Whether they will beat or miss analyst expectations often seems akin to a lottery.   The beatings will continue until morale improves... [PT]   However, what is not akin to a lottery are the seasonal trends of corporate earnings and stock prices. Thus breweries will usually report stronger quarterly earnings after the...
  • The Gold-Silver Ratio Continues to Rise - Precious Metals Supply and Demand
      Is Silver Hard of Hearing? The price of gold inched down, but the price of silver footed down (if we may be permitted a little humor that may not make sense to metric system people). For the gold-silver ratio to be this high, it means one of two things. It could be that speculators are avoiding the monetary metals and metal stackers are depressed. Or that something is going on in the economy, to drive demand for the metals in different directions.   As a rule the gold silver...
  • What Were They Thinking?
      Learning From Other People's Mistakes is Cheaper One benefit of hindsight is that it imparts a cheap superiority over the past blunders of others.  We certainly make more mistakes than we’d care to admit.  Why not look down our nose and acquire some lessons learned from the mistakes of others?   Bitcoin, weekly. The late 2017 peak is completely obvious in hindsight... [PT]   A simple record of the collective delusions from the past can be quickly garnered from...

Support Acting Man

Item Guides

Austrian Theory and Investment

j9TJzzN

The Review Insider

Archive

Dog Blow

350x200

THE GOLD CARTEL: Government Intervention on Gold, the Mega Bubble in Paper and What This Means for Your Future

Realtime Charts

 

Gold in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Gold in EUR:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Silver in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Platinum in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

USD - Index:

[Most Recent USD from www.kitco.com]

 

Mish Talk

 
Buy Silver Now!
 
Buy Gold Now!