Something is Clearly Amiss in Manufacturing

As we have pointed out on occasion of last week’s economic data update, we tend to focus on the manufacturing sector for a number of reasons. These are: 1. the manufacturing sector is in fact the largest sector of the economy in terms of gross output; 2. given that the various stages of production of the sector are temporally removed from the consumption stage, it is susceptible to attracting a lot of malinvestment during boom periods (often as a boom progresses, malinvestment will later also flow to the consumer stages as overconsumption surges, but this has only been selectively the case in the current cycle); 3. wealth is generated by savings, investment and production (all of which appear to be in trouble).


collet_adaptersAssorted machine tools (adaptors) – typical early to intermediate stage products for use in other production processes


Our friend Michael Pollaro has mailed us two more charts pointing to growing weakness in the sector which we are reproducing below. Meanwhile, another hat tip is due to our friend BC, who has pointed out a recent development to us we were actually unaware of and that we show below as well. As you will see, we can actually observe a few oddities in the current cycle, which were not in evidence in previous cycles.

The first chart depicts the change in national ISM new manufacturing orders compared to the percentage change of the dollar value of core new factory orders according to US census data lagged by 6 months (for all manufacturing and manufacturing ex aircraft). As Michael remarked to us, the ISM data may be skewed by survivor bias in the current cycle.

As can be seen, normally the 6 months lagged change in the dollar value of core factory orders is aligned quite well with the ISM new order index (meaning, the latter is usually leading by about 4 to 6 months), but not this time. Instead, the two series have drifted apart quite a bit. We would argue that apart from survivor bias, there may also be a flaw in the seasonal adjustments to ISM data due to the large swings of the 2007-2009 recession (this is just a hunch).


1-ISM vs. US census orders laggedISM new orders index vs. change in $ value of core new factory orders incl. and excl. aircraft (census data) lagged by 6 months – click to enlarge.


Of course, the actual dollar value is what these new orders are worth to manufacturers in money terms. The recent plunge has already reached levels last seen during the 2000-2002 recession.

We would guess that there are two main drivers of this development: firstly, the massive slowdown in international trade due to economic weakness overseas combined with a stronger dollar has cut into export orders, and secondly, the plunge in oil prices has put a halt to capex in almost the entire fracking space; the same goes for other commodity producing operations, which are suffering due to the general decline in commodity prices. Given that (largely debt-financed) capex by the energy sector was a major factor in the recovery, we are now witnessing the effect of its ongoing demise.

Sales data from the automotive industry are still looking strong. This industry is a beneficiary of the large domestic market, low interest rates and lower gas prices, but there are two caveats: for one thing, there may be some “channel stuffing” going on, as dealer inventories have been growing for several years. Secondly, car sales seem extremely dependent on the expansion of the sub-prime car loan bubble.

This particular credit bubble is much smaller than the mortgage credit bubble was (with the combined value of owned and securitized car loans amounting to around $1 trillion), but in a sense it is also more dangerous for creditors, as the underlying collateral promises very little by way of recovery in the event of a big surge in defaults (traditionally the LTV of loans for used car is oscillating around 100% and for new cars around 90%).


2-subprime car loans-growthA slightly dated chart of the growth in sub-prime auto lending, with an appropriate ad – click to enlarge.


Next we show the percentage change (y/y) of the dollar value of new as well as unfilled orders of non-defense capital goods excl. aircraft, as well as the y/y percentage change in inventories of such goods. Here too an emerging downtrend is visible that is consistent with the early stages of a recession, even though it looks not decisive as of yet:


3-Dollar value of non-def capital goods ordersPercentage change (y/y) in the dollar value of new and unfilled orders and inventories of non-defense capital goods excl. aircraft – click to enlarge.


The last time a similar dip came into view, the Fed immediately launched more QE, thereby postponing a downturn and allowing more capital malinvestment to pile up – this time, the Fed is fantasizing about rate hikes.


Credit Conditions Worsen Without a Rise in Interest Rates

The next chart, similar to the first one, shows something very odd. Usually interest rate markets are in an observer-participant feedback loop with Federal Reserve policy. As the Fed seemingly “follows” market rates, some observers, such as e.g. Eugene Fama from the “rational expectations” school, have concluded that it has no control over interest rates at all, but as every market observer well knows, this isn’t entirely true.

What happens is rather that market rates on the short end are driven by growing speculative credit demand, inflation expectations as well as market anticipation of future Fed policy moves. The Fed in turn is indeed influenced by these market signals, which it partly indirectly creates – i.e., it is a feedback loop.

One only has to look at the most recent moves in short term rates, which were first driven up by expectations about a September rate hike, and then plunged after no such rate hike was announced and the useless “dot plot” showed one FOMC member moving his expected federal funds rate dot into negative territory (the culprit not surprisingly was Narayana Havenstein – whose views we have previously discussed here and here).

Moreover, the Fed has actively contributed to the bulk of the approx. 112% increase in the true money supply (TMS-2) between January of 2008 and September 2015. It is very difficult to argue that such a vast addition to the money supply isn’t going to affect gross market rates.

Anyway, at the beginning of a boom, the Fed pumps, either by lowering its policy rates (thus inducing banks to offer credit at lower rates) or as has been the case since 2008, by actively “printing” money in addition to this. When at some later stage price pressures emerge, it attempts to “cool the economy down” by hiking its administered interest rates. Assorted capital malinvestments then tend to be revealed as unprofitable, leading to rising defaults, the liquidation of malinvested capital and the emergence of recessions. This time though, something different is apparently happening:


4-Charge-offs vs. Fed Funds-2The annual rate of change of the sum of charge-offs and delinquencies of industrial and commercial loans (black line) compared to the effective federal funds rate (red line) – click to enlarge.


As you can see, there has been a strong correlation between emerging loan defaults and the federal funds rate in the past, as one would expect, as economic busts usually emerge in the wake of an increase in interest rates. Recently, the change rate of the sum of industrial loan charge-offs and delinquencies has however moved into positive territory with the Federal Funds rate firmly stuck close to zero.

This indicates to us that since 2008, boom conditions require regular doses of QE to continue, and that the current rate of monetary inflation (a still hefty 8.35% as of the end of September) may not be sufficient to keep all bubble activities in the economy on artificial life support.

This in turn would jibe with our recent observation that the economy’s pool of real savings is likely in severe trouble. Speaking of savings, we want to point readers to an excellent recent post by Mish on the topic of savings, which inter alia quotes Dr. Frank Shostak extensively, who is a well-known modern-day proponent of the subsistence fund theory (we would also point readers to Richard von Strigl’s book Capital and Production in this context).

Apparently some Keynesian dunderhead once again asserted that people are “saving too much” – ironically on the same day when another headline informed readers that “most Americans have less than $1,000 in savings”. Of course there cannot be such a thing as “too much savings”, and proponents of the so-called “savings glut” theory (such as former Fed chief Bernanke) are confusing numbers piling up in accounts due to massive money printing with savings, which is an error of monumental proportions.



If we didn’t hear every day from well-informed “data-dependent” bureaucrat circles that everything is A-OK, we’d guess that the economy is indeed on the threshold of a bust.

yellen_cartoon_ben_garrisonThe official message.


Meanwhile, if we are interpreting the implications of recent developments in credit-land correctly, it would indicate that central bank policy is going to continue to remain much looser for much longer than most people currently assume – with all that implies. Primarily it implies a persistent zombification of the economy a la Japan, occasionally interrupted by downturns of steadily increasing severity.


More machine tools hoping for a sale


Addendum: A Slump in Rail Car Orders

The demise of the fracking boom has claimed another victim as Bloomberg recently reported: Rail car orders are in a severe slump, “reminiscent of the early 1980’s” as the author avers. Bloomberg provides this chart:


railcar odersRail car orders slump in the wake of the fracking boom’s demise – click to enlarge.


As Bloomberg notes:


“Rail car makers still have plenty of work with a backlog of 122,591 units. That’s down from a record of 142,837 at the end of last year, about five times as many as at the end of 2010 before the crude-by-rail boom began.”


Alas, this is like reporting about a “nice backlog in new housing starts” in 2007. It will simply add to the stock of misguided investments (resp. of goods that will prove difficult to sell once there is an increase in order cancellations).


Charts by: Michael Pollaro, WSJ, St. Louis Federal Reserve Research, Bloomberg




Emigrate While You Can... Learn More




Dear Readers!

You may have noticed that our so-called “semiannual” funding drive, which started sometime in the summer if memory serves, has seamlessly segued into the winter. In fact, the year is almost over! We assure you this is not merely evidence of our chutzpa; rather, it is indicative of the fact that ad income still needs to be supplemented in order to support upkeep of the site. Naturally, the traditional benefits that can be spontaneously triggered by donations to this site remain operative regardless of the season - ranging from a boost to general well-being/happiness (inter alia featuring improved sleep & appetite), children including you in their songs, up to the likely allotment of privileges in the afterlife, etc., etc., but the Christmas season is probably an especially propitious time to cross our palms with silver. A special thank you to all readers who have already chipped in, your generosity is greatly appreciated. Regardless of that, we are honored by everybody's readership and hope we have managed to add a little value to your life.


Bitcoin address: 12vB2LeWQNjWh59tyfWw23ySqJ9kTfJifA


10 Responses to “US Economy – More Ominous Data Points”

  • therooster:

    “The bust will come, but because average Joe is convinced that current policy works, he applauds the central bank’s effort to get him out of the bust.”

    Rodney …

    I tutor a few economists on the basis of some changing conditions that are not mainstream at this juncture.
    The boom-bust cycles are something we like to refer to as the “Newtonian cycles” of ups and downs, primarily based on the inflation and deflation of debt based liquidity.

    As long as there is nothing to “supplement” the debt-based liquidity (fiat currency) so that it may be removed , the need for some other form of liquidity will remain, unless of course, we want to suffer the perils of a depressed economy. I think of this challenge as something that has historically resided on the capability/incapability axiom, not as a matter of intention, as some would theorize. This is simply because we can only do what we are capable of doing as a matter of fact. It’s best to go with facts where available. The perception of other people’s intention often get in our way.

    This is exactly where 21st century tools lend their hand in being able to create a monetization and distribution of gold based currency that is denominated by its mass. Mass is limited and finite but as long as its worth is variable by the marketplace , liquidity is fully scalable and when applied properly , that boom-bust cycle can be reduced in amplitude over time and eventually eliminated.

    This is just another way of looking at the benefit of debt-free liquidity as an addition to existing debt based liquidity in the formation of a liquidity yin-yang where the market can govern by way of market osmosis.

    When we can increase liquidity while reducing outstanding debt at the same time, that’s a unique progress !

    There is a twisted irony here. The FED produces the USD. That dollar has a dual function. It acts as a currency (debt based) but it also acts in support of gold currency where the dollar is a real-time measure of scale , where gold is a settlement currency in real-time. We can trade (and are) debt-free widgets for debt-free gold directly. No debt creation or debt overhang has to be used.

  • Mark Humphrey:

    The gradual impoverishment of business is caused by capital consumption. The consumption of capital is caused by monetary inflation, plus the tightening web of regulations, plus government spending that wastes what could be used in private production.

    Capital consumption explains why capital investment is anemic, real wage rates are slipping and unemployment is stubbornly high. The more government spends, the more businesses waste through malinvestment and stock buys/dividends funded from capital, the less remains for productive expenditure of businesses. Reduced productive expenditure leads to declining manufacturing, as we’ve seen recently in certain sectors such as exporters and oil.

    Thanks for this interesting article–excellent as always.

    • rodney:

      Yes, and therein lies the problem: The capital consuming boom has a sort of instant gratification effect. The average person sees it and says “See? It works!”.

      The bust will come, but because average Joe is convinced that current policy works, he applauds the central bank’s effort to get him out of the bust.

      It’s unfortunate that the ill effects that Austrian Economics predicts, like secularly diminishing productivity and real wages, come after several decades … Hard to explain to people who have become in love with their instant gratification.

      Eventually they will lose faith in today’s fantasy economics, when policy makers can no longer inflate and spend their way out of recession … My fear is that we then descend toward more radical proposals instead of giving the free market a try.

  • rodney:

    This sucker could go down …

  • therooster:

    SavvyGuy ….

    Yes, most liquidity is debt based. That’s the problem. It’s way out of balance. I know it, you know it and the bankers know it.

    You may have made a grave assumption that that bankers are not likely to relinquish their so-called “power”.

    I have good news for you. They are counting on a shift toward balance which can only be trusted to a healthy yin-yang of market liquidity, thanks to the market addition of assets-in-circulation. Not only does the healthy formation save the economy, it also allows for debt to be reeled in and saves the fiat currency system from collapse. THEY NEED THIS !!!

    The relationship is destined for symbiosis, but consistent with creation, it is light that comes out of darkness in its rightful order.

    Your historical view appears to have come from the “dark side” of the referenced yin-yang , which is a debt based paradigm and consistent with what you already know. Our perceptions all reside there until such time that we “step across” into “the light” where we find the asset based liquidity paradigm ….. which must have real-time applications and capabilities in place. You cannot pour new wine into old wineskins.

    Gold is now a real-time currency and fiat numbers are the real-time comparative price measures that support the “bridging” based on the comparison of fiat based pricing where dollars are not a medium of exchange but do provide a useful pricing scale for market comparison, comparison such as comparing the price scale of two debt-free items that can trade for each other.

    Having said the above, these useful price measures that have metamorphosed from their currency apprenticeship into tools of price comparison are absolutely necessary in the support of debt-free trading. Simply make one of the two comparative widgets a PM like gold or silver and “voila”, we have a new market driven standard for debt-free trading where gold or some other PM can be used as a market currency. This is not new. This was the same model that e-gold used when it came out in the 1990’s.

    The fiat process was a “necessary evil” on the road to symbiosis. The model is now a working model in the marketplace. It is not just a nice theory.

    Where most people have a “block” on arriving to this solid belief is on the basis of the unexplained, in which case, there tends to be a default tat goes to intention. It makes sense for us as we love to rationalize. It becomes “their story that they stick to” in view of the absence of a full picture (yin-yang). We all go through it ……… but in our own time, which also serves a profound purpose. No crashes in the debt markets …. please ! Rate of change is critical in this morphing and should serve to tell you why such a massive change cannot be top-down and MUST be bottom-up by way of market consciousness.

    We must be as wise as serpents, yet as gentle as doves.

  • zerobs:

    I can only speak anecdotally, but I am in the supply chain consulting business. Requests for our services dried up in 2007-2008 and people were laid off. We were able to start hiring again around 2011 but the feeling in the office today is that November is going to be very bad. We know there’s been a drop in work. There isn’t a lot of need to control the supply chain when you’ve got more than enough supply already.

  • therooster:

    Something is amiss in manufacturing , as well as other areas of the real economy, because something is a amiss within the landscape of liquidity. We cannot continue to look to debt as being the sole source of liquidity.

    We need to stir in some asset based liquidity to work toward a balance in the total liquidity model. The yin needs some yang that only the market can provide.

    Asset based liquidity (yang) will not only save the economy. It will save the debt based system from collapse too (yin). Everybody wins.

    The completion of a liquidity yin-yang will prove to be symbiotic.

    • SavvyGuy:

      Most of the liquidity today is debt-based, and not asset-based, for a clever reason: it is purposely designed like that in order to generate a perpetual yield stream to the issuers.

      Hoping for asset-based liquidity may be wishful thinking, as the money powers are not likely to voluntarily relinquish, or even merely reduce, their monopolistic choke-hold over the world economy!

      However, the downside of debt-based liquidity is that it eventually degenerates into an unwieldy Ponzi which eventually will have its Minsky moment.

      I’m no Einstein, but here’s my simple equation: Ponzi + Minsky = Ka-boom!

Your comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Most read in the last 20 days:

  • No results available

Support Acting Man

Austrian Theory and Investment


The Review Insider


Dog Blow

THE GOLD CARTEL: Government Intervention on Gold, the Mega Bubble in Paper and What This Means for Your Future

Realtime Charts


Gold in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from]



Gold in EUR:

[Most Recent Quotes from]



Silver in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from]



Platinum in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from]



USD - Index:

[Most Recent USD from]


Mish Talk

    Buy Silver Now!
    Buy Gold Now!