Demographics Driving Declines in Oil Consumption, Mounting Debt, & Central Bank Mismanagement

Sometimes, the simplest answer really is best.  I contend the primary and simplest factor that need be watched to gauge present and future economic activity are the changes in core populations (15-64 year old segment of the larger population) for any nation or grouping.

The core’s declining growth and outright shrinkage appear to be the trigger for declining oil consumption*. In turn, this slowing activity drives central bank reactionary interest rate  cuts intended to incentivize credit creation and leverage…all to get more (raise consumption) from less (a declining population set).

*Oil is generally irreplaceable by other sources and offers a good barometer of a nation’s general economic activity. 

 peoplePhoto credit: fmh


The chart below highlights the Bank of Japan’s (BOJ) interest rate reactions to the changing demographic nature of the Japanese population.  As Japan’s core population began declining, the BOJ pushed rates lower to incentivize more credit (consumption) from a declining number of consumers.


Chart-1, Japan core vs OldJapan’s core population vs. BoJ interest rates


And the Fed, faced with similar though less dire US demographic circumstances, emulated the BOJ’s actions despite the BOJ’s utter lack of success (below).


Chart-2-rates and federal debtUS interest rates, federal debt and core population trend – click to enlarge.


Central banks around the world, at best, are blinded by their formulas and hubris to the inevitable and certain demographic and population headwinds now very much upon us.  These central banks are reacting to the least surprising, most reliable, and most important data in existence.  Central banks, entrusted with economic stewardship of nations, have acted out of greed or the stupidity only academics can talk themselves into.

They have sailed downwind with all sheets available to make the good times fantastically better, but left nothing for the entirely predictable changing conditions we now face…negative demographics and population trends coupled with exhausted interest rate policy, over-indebtedness, and massive overcapacity for declining core populations.

This article will focus on various core populations, the associated oil consumption, and debt incursions.  I will also include Purchasing Power Parity (PPP…a calculation of relative capability of consumption per capita based on GDP/population).  PPP will be used to compare the declining wealthy core population’s consumption capacity vs. that of ascending poor and old populations.

*All population data and estimates come from the OECD, oil consumption from EIA (US Energy Information Administration), PPP from the IMF, and debt from various sources.


JAPAN – Population 127 million; PPP = $37.4k

Japan’s annual core population growth peaked in 1984 and went outright negative (YoY) in 1996, the same year Japanese oil consumption also peaked and began its ongoing, nearly 20 year decline (a 25% reduction in consumption over those 20 years).  Japan’s public debt load after having been fairly stable for a decade, began its moonshot from approx. 70% in the early ’90’s to today’s 250%…all in an effort to entice a declining consumer base to make up with leverage what they lacked in income growth and sheer quantity.

It should be noted Japan’s total population didn’t peak until 2010 and is down just over 1% since then, while oil consumption has fallen by 25% from its peak.  However, unless Japan undertakes the unlikely step to import population growth, the Japanese core population (which has already fallen nearly 11%) will ultimately fall in excess of 50%.  This is probably good from a sustainability perspective, but catastrophic for the younger Japanese who have to deal with the mountains of debt and government obligations to Japan’s elderly.

Somehow no one ever forced the Bank of Japan to answer how decades of foreseeable population declines (at a minimum) offset only by debt and ZIRP could ever be resolved by fewer people paying off or even servicing far more debt.


Chart-3, Japan oil consumption, debt-GDP, populationJapan: total oil consumption, public debt to GDP, core population


EU – Population 510 million; PPP = est. $38k

The 27 member European Union saw peak core population growth (YoY) in 1983.  By 2005 the EU hit peak oil consumption and by 2011, the core population began to shrink outright.


Chart-4-EU, oil consumption, populationEU: oil consumption and population


GERMANY – Population 81 million; PPP = $46k

German peak core population growth (YoY) likely occurred prior to 1980 and by 1998, Germany’s core population began to shrink outright…the same year Germany’s oil consumption peaked and began an 18% fall that has yet to end.  However, Germany was able to avoid the large debt increases of its neighbors due to the advent of the Euro and EU giving Germany an EU-wide, single currency market for its superior export engine.

Germany’s economic well being amid a massive core population shrinkage can only be continued by the maintenance and health of the EU (likely contradictory factors).  Otherwise, Germany’s ongoing massive population declines, if not offset by enormous numbers of immigrants, will cripple its economy, just like happened to Japan


Chart-5-Germany, oil consumptionGermany: oil consumption, core population growth


Chart-6-Germany, population, oil, debtGermany: core population trend, oil consumption and public debt to GDP ratio


FRANCE – Population 66 million, PPP = $40.4k

French oil consumption and core population growth peaked prior to 1980…but most recently French oil consumption peaked in ’01 and began its 15% ongoing fall.  Public debt rose from a modest 58% to today’s 95% of GDP…and worst of all for France, its core population flat-lines from here solely due to ongoing low skill and poorly educated immigrants offsetting the falling native core population.


Chart-7-France-Oil ConsumptionFrance: oil consumption, core population growth


Chart-8-France-population, oil, debtFrance: core population trend, oil consumption and public debt to GDP ratio


SPAIN – Population 47 million; PPP = $33.7k

Spain was a late bubble bloomer with peaking core population growth in 2005 and peak oil consumption in ’07.  The 25% fall in oil consumption in such a short time is likely indicative of the depths of the economic downturn in Spain…reinforced by the rise in Spain’s public debt to GDP ratio from 36% to today’s 98%. Spain faces a significant ongoing core population decline and truly has no hope of outgrowing its problems.


Chart-9-Spain-Oil consumptionSpain: oil consumption, core population growth


Chart-10-Spain-population, oil, debtSpain: core population trend, oil consumption and public debt to GDP ratio


ITALY – Population 60 million; PPP = $35.5k

Italy, like France, likely saw peak oil consumption and peak core population growth prior to 1980.  The most recent peak oil consumption of 1995 and the 35% consumption reduction since then coincides with intermittent periods of core population shrinkage and growth before shrinkage likely finally takes over about 2020.  Italy, like Spain, has leaned on debt to bridge the demand gap (now a chasm) and is beyond any hope to outgrow its gargantuan debt load.


Chart-11-Italy-Oil consumptionItaly: oil consumption, core population growth


Chart-12-Italy-Population, oil, debtItaly: core population trend, oil consumption and public debt to GDP ratio


US – Population 321 million; PPP = $54.6k

In 1998 the core population growth (YoY) in the US peaked at about 2.6m. annually and growth began slowing.  By 2005, oil consumption peaked at 21m. bpd and has fallen 9% since then.  2015 saw core growth down to 800k and by 2025, core growth is estimated to be nearly flat…down about 95% from the peak growth rate of ’98.  However, all US population rebounds or stabilization are dependent on immigration, which is dependent on uncertain US low skill job growth and continued lax immigration policies, among other things.


Chart-13-US oil consumption, pop growthUS: oil consumption, core population growth, federal deficit


CHINA – Population 1.36 billion; PPP = $12.9k

Economists are shocked, yes shocked, at the slowing economic activity in China.  However, one glance at the chart below explains it quite clearly.  Core population growth turns outright negative in 2016 and debt has been substituted for missing consumer demand growth.  But the housing driven credit bubble has popped and combined with shrinking numbers of core consumers…China likely faces an outright contraction (aka, recession or depression), including declining oil consumption for decades.  China is also likely to turn to the debt creation power of the state to temporarily slow the declines.


Chart-14-China-core pop, oil consumption, debtChina: core population change, oil consumption and total debt


Chart-15-China-core pop, oil, creditChina: change rate in core population, oil consumption and credit


Chart-16-China-annual change ratesChina: annual change rate in core population, oil consumption and total debt


INDIA – Poulation 1.25 billion; PPP = $5.9k

Peak core population growth already came and went for India (2005 was the big year) and from now on there will be declining core population growth until about 2050…when core population growth turns to outright annual declines.  If India follows the usual pattern, declining oil consumption and peak consumption are likely to happen this decade….along with a sharp upward turn in credit and debt.  How this will play out as India is facing nothing but global headwinds as it attempts to deal with its  slowing growth is anybody’s guess.  By the way – Brazil, like India, saw peak core population growth in 1999 and its core population will begin declining before 2030.  Everything said about India is true for Brazil as well, only it will happen even sooner.


Chart-17-India-population statsIndia: population segments


Chart-18-India-core pop growth peakIndia: core population growth peak


AFRICA – Population 1.15 billion; PPP = $4.4k

As of 2015 Africa, India, and China represent 52% of earth’s population, however, they represent 65% of global population growth.  Of note, Africa’s present annual population growth is double that of India and quadruple that of China.  Nearly all African net population growth is under 65yrs/old (a trend that will only accelerate) vs. significant portions of Indian and majority portion of Chinese net population growth in the 65+yr/old segment.

Africa’s 5.1 births per female are more than double the global average of 2.7 – led by Uganda’s 7 births per female, where 50% of the population is under 15years old in a nation with an average income of $2000/year and a life expectancy of 51years.  Likewise, Africa’s largest population, Nigeria’s 185 million, is experiencing explosive growth, growing in excess of 5 million annually with 45% of the population under 15 years old in a nation with an average life span of 50 years.  Sub-Saharan Africa is truly the “anti-Japan” where instead of too few young adults to care for the old, there are too few adults to take care of all the young and too little money to feed them all.


Chart-19-Africa,India,ChinaAfrica, China, India: 52% of the global population in 2015


Chart-20-Africa,India,China, growth ratesAfrica, China, India: annual population growth rates


Probably worth contemplating is the relative impact of the ongoing changing source of population growth from higher income to lower income nations…to Africa.  On any given day, Africa includes about 57 countries (give or take a few) that range in PPP (Purchasing Power Parity) from small, well to do nations like Equatorial Guinea at approx. $32k/year, all the way down to population giants like Congo, Burundi, Malawi, Central African Republic, Somalia, Liberia all with PPP’s under a $1000/year.  So, if you put it all together and weight it evenly…the average African income comes out to about $4,423/year.

To put this PPP in perspective, this is less than 2/3rds of that of the average Indian, about 1/3rd of the average Chinese income, or less than 1/12th that of the average American.  20 of Africa’s 57 nations (representing 216 million Africans) have lower per capita purchasing power than the people of Haiti ($1,750/year)!  Only 16 African nations (representing 276 million persons) have PPP’s greater than India’s $5.9k/year.  Africa’s engine of population growth, Nigeria and its 5.2 million/year growth has a per capita PPP equal to that of India’s $6k/year PPP.  Africa seems not to be the answer to the question of how to revive slowing global consumption.


Chart-21-A-I-C-average incomeAverage annual income growth and potential consumption growth

Higher income population growth is fading away and is replaced by very low income population growth (charts below).  It is no coincidence that the global economy is slowing down…the only people “surprised” are those paid to be surprised and claim that no-one could have foreseen this.


Chart-22-OECD vs. rest of worldOECD vs. the rest of the world, change in population


Chart-23-high vs low consumer nationsHigh vs. low consumption nations, global population change


The growth trends are as follows: Africa rising, India fading, China turning outright negative to join most advanced economies…and the implications should be plain – except perhaps to those whose salaries depend on not knowing.



1- Once nations go through core peak population growth (YoY), subsequently or concurrently, they exhibit declining oil consumption suggesting slowing economic activity.   Central banks utilize lower interest rate policies to encourage higher credit consumption and leverage. Increasing debt is substituted for declining organic growth and weakening consumption.

2- As wealthy (with greater income, savings,  credit availability), high consumption nations core populations growth peaks, slows, and/or flattens or declines, those replacing them are from two inferior sources of consumption…1) the old (65+) from high consumption nations (generally living on fixed incomes and consuming significantly less in retirement) and 2) the relatively poor of India, Africa, Brazil, etc.  These high quantity, but low quality replacements (extremely low earnings, savings, little to no credit) are unable to make up for the lost consumption of shrinking advanced core populations.  Global overcapacity and waning commodity consumption are easily predictable and likely to persist for decades alongside the declining core populations and their weaker 3rd world replacements.  Global peak oil consumption is likely imminent.

3- The massive debts and obligations incurred (due to central bank interest rate mismanagement) to stimulate consumption in nearly all advanced and developing nations will never be repaid and the obligations will be monetized until?  Secular shrinking core populations will never be capable of repaying or servicing the soaring debt loads.  Massive defaults are a near certainty.

4- The EU, Japan, and China as engines of global growth are finished due to secular declining core and young populations (and burst credit bubbles).  This group will represent net consumption negatives for decades.

5- The US may provide some limited growth (entirely dependent on immigration) and India (plus Brazil) have already begun the long process of declining core growth and with or without a significant rise in credit/debt, peak oil consumption is imminent.

6- Africa is likely too poor, too young, and too late to effectively join the global economy and provide significant consumption growth.

7- The implications of declining global demand go far beyond oil or commodities but also to real estate, the core of the debt held by banks and the cornerstone of most citizens’ assets.  Declining numbers of buyers and declining demand for housing and commercial real estate is likely the true root of the Fed’s and most other central bank actions.  The Fed is a private corporation (not a portion of the Federal government) and its owners are the largest banks in the world.  That the Fed is taking action at the behest of its owners, the banks, to prop up the value of their collateral shouldn’t come as a surprise.

8- Central bank actions have taken what was always going to be a difficult transition from economies premised on population and credit growth to a more sustainable model and made it a looming disaster.  Central bank actions goosed the good times and left absolutely nothing enabling us to deal with the hard times to come.  Their leadership has been horrendous and their continued leadership is almost certain to induce catastrophic outcomes.

9- A change in leadership is needed if a positive, sustainable future is the goal.  Not simply a new president or party, but an entirely new dialogue and a paradigm shift.  Information such as I and many others are presenting must be disseminated to show the reality we face.  I believe that “we the people” of the US (and world) have faced worse situations than this.  We can do the hard things necessary if offered factual information and make the shared, painful short term changes that will lead to a brighter future for our children.


Charts by Chris Hamilton




Emigrate While You Can... Learn More




Dear Readers!

You may have noticed that our so-called “semiannual” funding drive, which started sometime in the summer if memory serves, has seamlessly segued into the winter. In fact, the year is almost over! We assure you this is not merely evidence of our chutzpa; rather, it is indicative of the fact that ad income still needs to be supplemented in order to support upkeep of the site. Naturally, the traditional benefits that can be spontaneously triggered by donations to this site remain operative regardless of the season - ranging from a boost to general well-being/happiness (inter alia featuring improved sleep & appetite), children including you in their songs, up to the likely allotment of privileges in the afterlife, etc., etc., but the Christmas season is probably an especially propitious time to cross our palms with silver. A special thank you to all readers who have already chipped in, your generosity is greatly appreciated. Regardless of that, we are honored by everybody's readership and hope we have managed to add a little value to your life.


Bitcoin address: 12vB2LeWQNjWh59tyfWw23ySqJ9kTfJifA


3 Responses to “Demographics and Major Financial and Economic Trends”

  • kcst1300:

    Global oil consumption is as follows mbpd: 2014 92mbpd, 2013 91, 2012 90, 2011 89, 2010 88, 2009 85, 2008 86, 2007 87, 2006 85, 2005 84, 2004 83. Oil consumption is not decreasing.

    The avg price per bbl in 2014 was around $100/bbl. The average price per bbl in 2015 is anybody’s guess but baring a significant event, will be significantly below $100/bbl. Current spot prices for both Brent and WTI are under $50/ bbl. I expect significant increases in oil consumption beginning in 2015 and continuing as prices are weak.

    Mr. Hamilton’s analysis was wealthy country centric. Developing countries will continue to drive (no pun intended) demand for oil as they desire autos coupled with relatively inexpensive gasoline. Auto ownership in India / China has much more room to grow.

  • SavvyGuy:

    Excellent analysis and charts, though I would also like to add that the widespread adoption of technology (e.g. cell-phones, the Internet, on-board electronics in higher-MPG vehicles, etc.) is perhaps also a causative factor in the economic slowdown and reduced oil consumption over the past decade or so.

Your comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Most read in the last 20 days:

  • The Gold Debate – Where Do Things Stand in the Gold Market?
      A Recurring Pattern When the gold price recently spiked up to approach the resistance area even Aunt Hilda, Freddy the town drunk, and his blind dog know about by now, a recurring pattern played out. The move toward resistance fanned excitement among gold bugs (which was conspicuously lacking previously). This proved immediately self-defeating - prices pulled back right away, as they have done almost every time when the slightest bit of enthusiasm emerged in the sector in recent...
  • Monetary U-Turn: When Will the Fed Start Easing Again? Incrementum Advisory Board Meeting Q1 2019
      Special Guest Trey Reik and Board Member Jim Rickards Discuss Fed Policy On occasion of its Q1 meeting in late January, the Incrementum Advisory Board was joined by special guest Trey Reik, the lead portfolio manager of the Sprott Institutional Gold & Precious Metal Strategy at Sprott USA since 2015 [ed note: as always, a PDF of the complete transcript can be downloaded further below].   Trey Reik of Sprott USA.   Also at the meeting, Jim Rickards, who is inter...
  • Acting Man Returns - A Brief Housekeeping Note
      Pater Temporarily Keels Over Regular readers have no doubt noticed that the blog has fallen silent for around three weeks and may be wondering what has happened. In a nutshell, we were hospitalized. After a lengthy time period during which our health gradually but steadily deteriorated (we have complained about this previously), we finally keeled over. Thereupon we were forced to entrust the ruin that houses our mind to an experienced team of doctors (depicted below).   A...
  • Watch Europe - Free Pass for the Elliott Wave European Financial Forecast
      Europe at an Important Juncture European economic fundamentals have deteriorated rather noticeably over the past year - essentially ever since the German DAX Index topped out in January 2018. Now, European stock markets have reached an important juncture from a technical perspective. Consider the charts of the Euro-Stoxx 50 Index and the DAX shown below:   The Euro-Stoxx 50 Index already peaked in early November 2017, the DAX followed suit in January 2018 – such divergent peaks...
  • Why Warren Buffett Should Buy Gold
      Riding the Tailwinds of Fiat Money Inflation to Fame and Fortune Warren Buffett bought his first shares of stock when he was 11 years old.  He saved up $114.75 and “went all in,” purchasing three shares of Cities Service preferred stock.  The day was March 11, 1942 – nearly 77 years ago.  Buffett recently reminisced about this purchase in his annual letter to shareholders:   “I had become a capitalist, and it felt good.”   The Oracle of Omaha – he was...
  • Fake Money’s Face Value Deceit
      Not the Brightest Tool in the Shed Shane Anthony Mele stumbled off the straight and narrow path many years ago.  One bad decision here.  Another there.  And he was neck deep in the smelly stuff. These missteps compounded over the years and also magnified his natural shortcomings.  Namely, that he’s a thief and – to be polite – a moron.   Over-educated he ain't: Shane Anthony Mele, whose expressive mug was captured by a Florida police photographer first in...
  • Rise of the Zombies - Precious Metals Supply and Demand
      Rise of the Zombies - Precious Metals Supply and Demand Last week, the prices of gold and silver fell $35 and ¢70, respectively. But what does that mean (other than woe unto anyone who owned silver futures with leverage)? The S&P 500 index and the euro was up a bit, though the yuan was flat and copper was down. Most notably, the spread between Treasury and junk yields fell. If the central banks can lower the risk of default premium, they can make everything unicorns and...
  • Bitcoin Bottom Building
      Defending 3,800 and a Swing Trade Play For one week, bulls have been defending the 3,800 USD value area with success. But on March 4th they had to give way to the constant pressure. Prices fell quickly to the 3,700 USD level. These extended times of range bound trading are typical for Bitcoin Bottom Building in sideways ranges. This 60 minute chart of Bitcoin shows (represented by the yellow candlestick wicks) how the bulls defended 3,800 USD :   BTCUSDT 60 minute chart...
  • The Magic Doesn't Always Work - Precious Metals Supply and Demand
      The Week Ends with a Surprise The weekly closing prices of the precious metals were up +$5 and +¢11. But this does not tell the full story of the trading action. Prices were dropping until Friday. More precisely, Friday 8am in New York, or 1pm in London.   Gold and silver - back in demand on Friday... [PT]   At that moment, a light cabal conspiring to jack the price struck traders began buying. The end result was the prices, especially of silver, rose on the day...
  • Intraweek Profit Opportunities
      In 6 of 10 Countries a Single Day Outperforms the Entire Week! In the Seasonal Insights issue of 13 February 2019 I presented a study illustrating the power of intraweek effects. The article was entitled “S&P 500 Index: A Single Day Beats the Entire Week!” The result of the study: if one had been invested exclusively during a single day of the week since 2000  – namely on Tuesday – one would have outperformed a buy and hold strategy, beating the broad market. Moreover,...

Support Acting Man

Item Guides

Austrian Theory and Investment


The Review Insider


Dog Blow


THE GOLD CARTEL: Government Intervention on Gold, the Mega Bubble in Paper and What This Means for Your Future

Realtime Charts


Gold in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from]



Gold in EUR:

[Most Recent Quotes from]



Silver in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from]



Platinum in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from]



USD - Index:

[Most Recent USD from]


Mish Talk

Buy Silver Now!
Buy Gold Now!