The Misfortune of Being Born Into a State

In an essay titled “The State”, Randolph Bourne, an American writer, made a distinction between a country and a state that I find crucial. He described one’s country as “an inescapable group into which we are born”. In his view, a country is “a concept of peace, tolerance, of living and letting live. But the State is essentially a concept of power, of competition; it signifies a group in its aggressive aspects. And we have the misfortune of being born not only into a country but into a State, and as we grow up we learn to mingle the two feelings into a hopeless confusion”.

 

Randolph BourneRandolph Silliman Bourne: a lifelong enemy of the State and war. His great unfinished work “The State” was discovered after his death. Bourne’s odd physical appearance owed to tuberculosis of the spine, which he suffered in childhood. Jeffrey Riggenbach has published a great paean on the brilliance of Randolph Bourne at the Mises Institute.

Photo credit: Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Columbia University

 

Bourne continues to say:

 

“It cannot be too firmly realized that war is a function of States and not of nations. Indeed, that it is the chief function of States. War is a very artificial thing. It is not the naïve spontaneous outburst of herd pugnacity; it is no more primary than is formal religion. War cannot exist without a military establishment, and a military establishment cannot exist without a State organization. War has an immemorial tradition and heredity only because the State has a long tradition and heredity. But they are inseparably and functionally joined. We cannot crusade against war without crusading implicitly against the State. And we cannot expect, or take measures to ensure that this war is a war to end war, unless at the same time we take measures to end the State in its traditional form.”

 

Also Hans-Hermann Hoppe, in the spirit of Ludwig von Mises, came to a similar conclusion, when he stated: 

 

“As tax-funded monopolists of ultimate decision making, states can externalize the costs associated with aggressive behavior onto hapless taxpayers. Hence, states are by nature more prone to become aggressors and warmongers than agents or agencies that must themselves bear the costs involved in aggression and war.”

 

So, is there any truth to what Bourne and Hoppe believed? Is it applicable to today’s world? The short answer is: Yes. I would like to take the opportunity to explain why I am convinced that war and the State are inseparable, even today. I would like to draw your attention to some historical facts, since I believe that it is essential to understand history in order to understand the present.

 

ludwig_von_misesLudwig von Mises, probably the greatest economist of the 20th century. Mises was not an anarchist, but he was highly critical of the “force monopolist” government and harbored no illusions about it. His incisive analyses of government and bureaucracy are highly recommended reading.

Photo credit: Ludwig von Mises Institute

 

Sutton’s Analysis of US Military Aid to Russia

Professor Anthony C. Sutton, a professor of history, economics and politics, who was born 1925 in London and taught at the Universities of London, Göttingen and California, had a huge impact on my beliefs. In 1962, he became a US citizen and worked as a research fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution from 1968 to 1973. In 1973, he published his first book “National Suicide – Military Aid to the Soviet Union”, in which he found that the Soviet Union received approximately 90% of its technology directly from the West, with the particular support of the US government and large US multinational companies. At the time, Sutton still believed in an open society and thought that these deals originated because of the ignorance, mental laziness and the incapability of an open society to understand the long-term implications of a totalitarian system. However, he never thought that a certain agenda by the US establishment stood behind the “military aid”.

 

anthony suttonBritish and American (he was born in London, but held both nationalities) economist and historian Anthony Cyril Sutton. Sutton has left us with a number of highly interesting books about the decisive events shaping the 20th century.

Photo credit:Stanley Monteith

 

In 1974, Sutton published another book titled “Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution”, in which he wrote about the financial support that the Russian October Revolution of 1917 got from Wall Street. He exposes the “relief payments” the Russian revolutionaries received, as well as the trade with Russian gold for financing the Bolsheviks. The USA even supported revolutionary propaganda and employed pro-communist writers.

In summary: According to Sutton, major players in both the US economy and US government supported the communist revolution in Russia. Sutton believed that there were two reasons for the US support of the Bolsheviks. First, they believed that providing technology to Russia would reduce the technological development of the country and thus would minimize future competition from Russia. Second and more important, according to Sutton, was the fact that foreign companies were given access to the Russian market with quasi monopolies as long as they complied with the wishes of the Bolsheviks.

 

vladimir-lenin-quotesLenin addresses a crowd in St. Petersburg shortly after his return to Russia from exile in Switzerland. It is surprising how much help the Bolsheviks received from the seemingly most unlikely sources. Germany’s Kaiser showered them with money because they promised they would end Russia’s participation in the war. Wall Street magnates decided that it would be advantageous if the Bolsheviks received a finacial shot in the arm from the citadel of capitalism as well. Apparently they had not listened when Lenin remarked that the capitalists would sell him the rope he would hang them with.

 

Sutton wrote several other noteworthy books including “Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler” (1976), were he describes the intricate relationship between Wall Street and the Nazi regime. He believed that without financing from Wall Street, the German war machine would not have been able to sustain itself.

 

Government Lies and their Cost

This leads me to another point: Most people don’t question what their government does, especially when it comes to foreign policy. This gives power-hungry politicians the opportunity to lie to the public, so that people willingly accept a war in a foreign country. A recent example is the Iraq war, where the public was led to believe that Saddam was hiding weapons of mass destruction and was an imminent threat to the United States. After the invasion, however, it turned out that Iraq had no WMDs and the threat was exaggerated to gain public support for the war.

Another example. We all know that the CIA and other intelligence services have been involved in questionable activities for ages. My initial motivation for this article was a video with the title “The War Against The Third World” describing America’s foreign interventionism and the expansion of the military-industrial complex. The video shows a speech by John Stockwell, a former Marine and CIA paramilitary intelligence case officer. The video has several different aspects, but I will only mention a few. One of the most shocking excerpts was the section where Stockwell talks about the Church Committee investigation:

 

“Senator Church said that in the 14 years before he did his investigation he found that they had run 900 major operations and 3000 minor operations. And if you extrapolate that over the whole period of the 40 odd years that we’ve had a CIA, you come up with 3000 major operations and over 10,000 minor operations. Every one of them illegal. Every one of them disruptive of the lives and societies of other peoples and many of them bloody and gory beyond comprehension, almost.”

 

church committeeChurch committee hearing in 1974 on the CIA’s activities.

Photo credit: Boise State University

 

Another important aspect is how Nixon and Kissinger “secretly” bombed neutral Cambodia for 14 months in 1969, unleashing 110,000 tons of bombs on the country. The irony of this story is that Kissinger actually received the Nobel Peace Prize in 1973 for his “honorable” actions to resolve the Vietnam War. Such covert action was easier in the past, because the government controlled radio, TV and newspapers. As we will show later, this is becoming increasingly difficult, due to the fact the Internet has become an independent news source for many.

 

ny_times_12_24_1974_huge_CIA_operation_reported_in_US_against_antiwar_forcesA late 1974 newspaper headline (New York Times) on the CIA’s operations against anti-war activists and other political dissidents

 

Are the Elites Implementing a “Divide and Conquer” Strategy?

“Divide and Conquer” is one of the oldest strategies used by the ruling powers. The focus of this strategy is to turn people against each other so that they don’t turn against the establishment itself. This division can take on different forms, such as dividing by race, religion, nationality, poor vs. rich or East vs. West.

When I look at the world today and see what is happening, it is obvious that racism is accelerating and tensions between Christians, Jews and Muslims are increasing tremendously. Europe is currently being flooded with a wave of refugees from the Middle East and Africa who have nothing to lose. I remember the conversations I had while living in the Middle East for two years.

 

philipofmacedonA bust of Philipp II of Macedon, whom the strategy of “divide et impera” is ascribed to. It was later successfully implemented by the Roman Empire and has been a staple of politics ever since. How do you rule over people? Divide them, and make them fight among themselves.

 

Back in 2004 the overwhelming majority of the people I spoke to in Syria thought that Europe was a kind of “Promised Land”. They believed that they would live a picturesque life, similar to what they see on TV, if they only made it to Europe. Now their dream has been destroyed within seconds. The “Promised Land” turned out to be nothing more than a mirage. They are ending up in refugee camps and the majority will not even be allowed to work.

With no way of working or supporting their families, I am confident they will become vulnerable to radical ideas they hear in some mosques from extremist Wahabis and Salafists. Therefore I am certain that the situation can and will lead to social tensions. Additionally, the European welfare state is essentially broke and unsustainable.

When we take the economic weakness into consideration it becomes clear that most refugees will not find the “European Dream” they were looking for. Ironically, most of the refugees currently fleeing war or oppressive regimes are fleeing situations which Western governments have created or at least endorsed in the first place.

 

refugeesRefugees arriving on Italy’s shores

Photo credit: DPA

 

Ever Expanding State Power at Home

All this meddling in foreign affairs does not only impact foreign countries, but also affects domestic policies. War is often used by the State to further restrict individual liberties and increase the power of the police apparatus. In the essay we mentioned earlier, Randolph Bourne summed up the impact of war on domestic policy as follows:

 

“With the shock of war the state comes into its own again. It is the reason given for high taxes, internal revenue bureaucracies, pervasive spying, censorship, military conscription, the abolition of civil liberties, heavy debt, an explosive growth of government spending and borrowing, extensive excise taxation, nationalization of industries, socialist central planning, massive public indoctrination campaigns, the punishment and imprisonment of dissenters to the state’s rule, the shooting of deserters from its armies, the conquest of other countries, inflation of the currency, demonization of private enterprise and the civil society for being insufficiently “patriotic”, the growth of the military/industrial complex, a vast expansion of government pork barrel spending, the demonization of the ideas of freedom and individualism and those who espouse them, and a never-ending celebration, if not deification, of statism and militarism.”

 

Additionally, today terrorism is increasingly being used to increase the government’s powers at home. According to John Whitehead from the Rutherford Institute, North Dakota has become the first state to make it legal for the police to fly drones equipped with everything from rubber bullets to pepper spray to tear gas, sound cannons and tasers. He expects 30,000 drones to be airborne in American airspace by 2020.

I would like to mention a statement by Prof. Carroll Quigley in his book “Weapons Systems and Political Stability”. He claims that as weapons become more sophisticated and professional, the government employing them becomes more totalitarian.

 

dronesAmerica’s increasingly militarized police forces have a new toy – and soon it will be armed.

Photo credit: AP

 

How can you Protect Yourself in such an Environment?

I am confident that physical Gold and Silver can protect you to a certain extent from government tyranny. Let me start by explaining the reason why I work in the gold business. First, I am confident that with a monetary system based on free banking, the system of today could not possibly exist. This is because most people would not carry out transactions in a fragile and debt based currency. Second, I learned from history that gold is money – everything else is credit!

Gold has been money for over 5000 years. On the other hand, our current monetary system has been in place for only slightly over 40 years. I believe economic prosperity is not possible when the money that we use can be created out of thin air. Since 2008, global debt has increased from 140 trillion to 200 trillion dollars. Our economy is in shambles and the newly created money goes to the state and its allies, generally bypassing the real economy. I don’t think that we will ever see a real recovery until we return to a system of sound money. We have to choose between freedom or slavery. Only with free markets and the potential of individual minds as a source of inspiration can we build the basis for a free society.

 

Coenwulf_anglo_Saxon_gold_coinAn ancient Anglo-Saxon gold coin, depicting Coenwulf, King of Mercia (796-821).

 

Our current monetary system is the root cause of many evils of today. Let’s take war, a topic we discussed in this article, as an example. Without a monetary system that creates currency out of thin air, most of the wars that we have had and still have would simply not be financeable. This system is controlled by a few, who change the rules to their own benefit. And as we have seen they use their privileges to finance wars and to bribe politicians.

By holding your wealth in precious metals you are rejecting the current system and also protecting yourself from “financial tyranny”. This includes: capital controls, expropriation, bail-ins, bailouts, negative interest rates, market manipulation on a wide scale and massive paper currency fluctuations. The jurisdiction where you keep your precious metals is also essential in my view. I personally feel safe having my metals stored in Switzerland, a neutral country that doesn’t intervene in international affairs.

 

The Internet is the Light at the End of the Tunnel

Although things don’t look very positive at the moment, I’m convinced that sooner or later with the help of the Internet, people will start to understand the principles of freedom and appreciate what it means to be free. Broadcasting and distributing information that is accessible from all over the world and uncontrollable by the establishment is helping to spread better ideas. You probably wouldn’t be reading these lines if it weren’t for the Internet. The Internet is already making it increasingly difficult for governments to cover up their actions.

However, more importantly, the Internet will not only change the way we access information. It will also change the financial system. We are standing at a crossroads and I am convinced that the crypto currency movement will change the currency landscape in the foreseeable future. We will have different digital currencies, some of them are even based on gold. They will all compete freely on the market. Cash, checks, and other forms of “money” should gradually disappear. I am certain that taking away the government monopoly of money would lead to a safer world, as governments wouldn’t be able to print money out of thin air to finance their never ending wars.

Never forget that we always have a choice, even if the establishment is telling us otherwise. I personally choose voluntarism and a free market, what would your choice be?

 

This is an article reprinted from Global Gold’s Outlook Report (subscribe on www.globalgold.ch)

 

Image captions by PT

 

 

 

Emigrate While You Can... Learn More

 


 

 
 

Dear Readers!

You may have noticed that our so-called “semiannual” funding drive, which started sometime in the summer if memory serves, has seamlessly segued into the winter. In fact, the year is almost over! We assure you this is not merely evidence of our chutzpa; rather, it is indicative of the fact that ad income still needs to be supplemented in order to support upkeep of the site. Naturally, the traditional benefits that can be spontaneously triggered by donations to this site remain operative regardless of the season - ranging from a boost to general well-being/happiness (inter alia featuring improved sleep & appetite), children including you in their songs, up to the likely allotment of privileges in the afterlife, etc., etc., but the Christmas season is probably an especially propitious time to cross our palms with silver. A special thank you to all readers who have already chipped in, your generosity is greatly appreciated. Regardless of that, we are honored by everybody's readership and hope we have managed to add a little value to your life.

   

Bitcoin address: 12vB2LeWQNjWh59tyfWw23ySqJ9kTfJifA

   
 

One Response to “War is the Health of the State”

  • Crysangle:

    “As tax-funded monopolists of ultimate decision making, states can externalize the costs associated with aggressive behavior onto hapless taxpayers. Hence, states are by nature more prone to become aggressors and warmongers than agents or agencies that must themselves bear the costs involved in aggression and war.”

    A state also lacks the informal nature associated with the concept of nation . I have found that statist enterprise of all kind abuses the notion of nation by first of all artificially delimiting it to historical political and physical parameters , whereas nation originally means of people with common ancestry – the ancestral cultural group one is born into.
    So it is no surprise that we now have nation building as part of our modern vocabulary , it represents the effort of state to create nation out of itself , or in that of another country to suit itself .
    So from the start, the concept of state is perverse in its attempts , something unnatural and imposed , and searching to usurp whatever loyalties that pre-exist so as to transform them into into a new definition that suits the establishing authority .

    States not only externalize the costs , they are also very clever at attributing responsibility , or to put it another way , escaping responsibility . They tend to consider all existing laws to be of nation and for nation , with the position of authority as neutral intermediary servant to the greater good , demanding a discipline from its state apprentices that may then be demanded from the rest of society so as to maintain the construct intact and just . That is in fact a construct that is designed to run to perpetuity , just as is the associated debt of state . For when the goal , as it most often is , is to achieve an equality (for example before justice) , and with the means to the end founded on inequalities (the state hierarchy) , it cannot but fail continuously , and knowingly so . Why ? Not only because of the existence of a pretentious hierarchy , but more simply because people are not equal in the real world , because culture is never fixed or flat , the world around us changes so fluidly that it may never be forced to fit into one set of rules , one circumstance . It is a crime to attempt to force it to .

    However , under the law of most states , no matter that you are not even actively working against their authority , you will be criminalized , in one form or another , if you do not adhere to the principles being expounded , and it will be understood as your own fault , or your own fault … or your own fault . The reason is simple , those in authority are so fearful of the slightest loss of respect that they will first attempt to bribe , then coerce , then viciously pursue any and all that present a challenge to them . It is as simple as an on or off switch . Fortunately for most people the state simply does not have the capability to enforce itself as it would wish , and maybe that is what makes it doubly dangerous as it then relies on increased threat to do its work for it. You can see where that leads to in a cycle of subsequent rejection by parts of society – states are then ” more prone to become aggressors” .

    So there is more to the story than extracting from hapless taxpayers , and that would be how state actually transforms peoples into hapless taxpayers . If we use Roman history as an example , often first came some trade , then an introduction of colonies that were somewhat independent and mixed with local society , then further authority , standardization and if necessary full conquest . This would happen over centuries sometimes , so was not preplanned . What seems to have happened is that as wealth, influence, and power grew, from a more natural environment of trade , so ambitions and available possibility of ambition took over , and unfortunately one of imposition took dominion when similar ambition was not welcomed in other form.

    http://www.usu.edu/markdamen/1320Hist&Civ/chapters/08ROMFAL.htm

    Provides a slightly different view to the evolution of the Roman empire , and a pertinent question would arise in drawing an analogy to the modern world , particularly the European project . I have read that the understanding by the political class and royalty of some countries is along the lines that as society became mixed internationally , so it was necessary to adapt to the new format . Maybe the idea of individual states was beginning to look more fragile from a statist viewpoint , either in historical terms or in ability of management , or maybe further opportunity was understood possible from a stronger position of a larger state . Given the view of the above linked article , I have to wonder if we are headed towards a fast track dissolution of an unnatural authority built of other unnatural authorities , or if we will witness a forced attempt at a supranational authority , and one that is in no way prepared for the position it would have – and how could it be , its synthetic is just that .

    As we are on the topic of state , it bears some thought . When we talk of dislike of state we are really short on definition . Do we mean the bureaucratic structure , the concept of somewhat alien authority , a self serving disconnected entity that grants itself the use of force , whether there is democratic process ? A state does not have to be ‘bad’ , but the systemic format of process is certainly not ‘human’ but for those that represent it , and that makes the subject what ? Inferior or an outsider ? These are difficult questions , even the meaning of words like democracy are very subjective , as the discussion at

    http://www.theguardian.com/notesandqueries/query/0,,-80426,00.html

    highlights .

    I am only able to conclude that organizing people beyond a certain threshold is not only wasteful, but ultimately doomed , and I think that threshold must both include voluntary participation as well as a clear respect for the individual and his own pursuits , as long as he is respectful of others .

    So why is it that state and government spend their time continuously demanding the respect of others ?

    The answer is possibly because they wish to legitimize their conquest by adding insult, the insult being coercively subjecting a person to their authority , when clearly they otherwise have none .

Your comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Most read in the last 20 days:

  • No results available

Support Acting Man

Austrian Theory and Investment

j9TJzzN

The Review Insider

Archive

Most Read Articles

  • No results available

Dog Blow

THE GOLD CARTEL: Government Intervention on Gold, the Mega Bubble in Paper and What This Means for Your Future

Realtime Charts

 

Gold in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Gold in EUR:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Silver in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Platinum in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

USD - Index:

[Most Recent USD from www.kitco.com]

 

Mish Talk

     
    Buy Silver Now!
     
    Buy Gold Now!