The Press Takes Notice of a Small Problem

We have previously discussed the plans announced by EU commission president JC Juncker to “rescue” the euro area economy by means of € 300 billion of state-directed spending (see Juncker’s Solution for details). Now the mainstream press is also beginning to wonder where the money for this ambitious spending plan is supposed to be coming from.

A report by Reuters contains a few points worth commenting on:

 

“New European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker is preparing a 300 billion euro ($375 billion) investment plan he will present as a cornerstone of efforts to revive an ailing economy. But history suggests the program risks becoming an exercise in financial engineering rather than a conduit for the new money the region needs to help boost output and create jobs.

A flagship project of the new European Union executive, the investment scheme is due to be unveiled before Christmas. It is still being finalized and few details have been made public. If all the money it promises is raised and spent, it could provide the 28-nation EU with roughly an additional 0.7 percent of GDP in investment per year over three years.

“It is significant,” said Carsten Brzeski, economist at ING bank in Frankfurt. “You would expect some kind of a multiplier effect from investment on jobs and purchasing power and it would increase the growth potential. The downside is that public investment can take years before it gets started.”

But even more than “when?”, the big question hanging over the plan is “how much?”. The 300 billion euros is an overall target for both the public and private money that the Commission hopes to mobilize. The Commission itself does not have any money and is funded through annual EU budgets that must be balanced. Of the region’s 28 governments, only Germany seems to have public finances strong enough to significantly increase investment. But in its drive to have a balanced budget, Berlin is not keen to spend more.

So the Commission plans to use what little public money is available to lure bigger private funds into projects that would otherwise seem too risky or with too low a rate of return.

“Our aim is to ‘crowd in’ private money for big infrastructure projects in the energy sector, transport, broadband or research and development. The private sector cannot take all the risks,” Commission Vice President Jyrki Katainen told Reuters.

 

(emphasis added)

First of all, the money can evidently not be raised by EU governments if they try to fulfill the obligations of the fiscal compact. To this we would note that the compact, if anything, suffers from still not being truly enforceable when it comes to larger member nations such as France and Italy. From our perspective, the attempt to impose some sort of fiscal discipline is praiseworthy in principle, but the actual approach to “austerity” and economic reform leaves a lot to be desired, to put it mildly.

Unfortunately the compact does not contain a specific clause with respect to spending – it merely refers to debt and deficits as a percentage of GDP. As a first measure, several countries have taken steps to artificially boost their GDP statistics by adding what seem highly subjective estimates of the value added by drug dealing, prostitution and other “black market” activities to the data. Worse though is that wherever possible, governments have avoided shrinking the State, and have instead imposed new burdens on the private sector, in many cases coupled with draconian enforcement. The additional taxes harm the economy, while the more drastic enforcement is obviously detrimental to liberty and peace, as it requires additional invasions of privacy, encourages snitching, and so forth.

 

1-EU government deficits

 EU government deficits (annual) as a percentage of GDP – click to enlarge.

2-EU-Government debtEU government debt as a percentage of GDP – click to enlarge.

A Plan that Will Consume Scarce Capital

Secondly, the belief in a “multiplier effect” once again runs into the problem that capital is both heterogeneous and scarce. If it is employed in state-directed investment projects, it must be removed from other employments. It is an apodictic certainty that in the vast majority of cases, it would be better employed in undertakings to which market participants have allocated it voluntarily. It seems obvious that investment projects planned by bureaucracies lack an important ingredient, namely the profit motive. They have therefore no reason to compare input costs to expected returns and to decide whether to undertake certain projects on that basis – and yet, the real capital to pursue these projects will have to be freed up elsewhere.

In the article excerpted above it is in fact admitted that the planned investment projects wouldn’t be touched by the private sector because they do not promise an adequate return. It really takes some doing for long-range investment projects to be so wasteful that they are seemingly not even able to produce a large enough illusory profit when the central bank’s administered interest rate stands almost at zero. Obviously, the private sector could and would gladly “take the risks” associated with these projects if they promised to produce profits in excess of the returns available in other investments. The fact that higher returns are available elsewhere is the market’s way of telling entrepreneurs that there are consumers wants the satisfaction of which is more urgent.

The lack of returns proves ipso facto that the proposed projects are destined to waste scarce capital. The so-called “multiplier effect” is an illusion – it is certainly possible for capital consumption to masquerade as “growth” for a while, but its true nature will eventually always be revealed.

As Mises noted to this:

 

Today the majority of the citizens look upon government as an agency dispensing benefits. The wage earners and the farmers expect to receive from the treasury more than they contribute to its revenues. The state is in their eyes a spender, not a taker. These popular tenets were rationalized and elevated to the rank of a quasi-economic doctrine by Lord Keynes and his disciples. Spending and unbalanced budgets are merely synonyms for capital consumption.

 

(emphasis added)

 

Conclusion:

In reality, these spending programs are simply slightly more elaborate and sophisticated versions of Keynesian ditch digging. They make precisely as much sense. If European politicians really want to help to spur economic growth, they must bid adieu to the notion that economies can be “jump-started” by spending on undertakings that are mainly characterized by their inability to produce a return. What is instead needed is a repeal of the ubiquitous red tape hampering entrepreneurs, lower taxes and less government involvement in the market economy.

Top-down investment decrees are bound to do more harm than good in the end. The urge of local governments in Spain to build a new airport in every two-bit town during the boom has left the landscape dotted with a number of large mute witnesses attesting to this.

 

European Commission President Juncker addresses a news conference at the European Commission headquarters in BrusselsJC Juncker: trying to spend money he doesn’t have on projects that everybody knows already won’t produce a return. It is not exactly the most brilliant plan ever conceived.

(Photo via Reuters)

 

Charts by: Euro-Stat

 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

   

Dear Readers!

You may have noticed that our header carries ab black flag. This is due to the recent passing of the main author of the Acting Man blog, Heinz Blasnik, under his nom de plume 'Pater Tenebrarum'. We want to thank you for following his blog for meanwhile 11 years and refer you to the 'Acting Man Classics' on the sidebar to get an introduction to his way of seeing economics. In the future, we will keep the blog running with regular uptates from our well known Co-Authors. For that, some financial help would be greatly appreciated. A special thank you to all readers who have already chipped in, your generosity is greatly appreciated. Regardless of that, we are honored by everybody's readership and hope we have managed to add a little value to your life.

   

Bitcoin address: 12vB2LeWQNjWh59tyfWw23ySqJ9kTfJifA

   
 

2 Responses to “EU – Planning to Spend Money It Doesn’t Have”

  • No6:

    I disagree about the multiplier effect. It certainly does exist, it is just that the multiplier is some fraction of a whole number, less than 1. With Junkers’ brilliant plan the multiplier could easily be 1/10 or less.

    • worldend666:

      The problem is any multiplier effect will create dependencies which will vanish once the initial spending boost comes to an end. Temporary jobs will have been created which will need to be liquidated, creating civil unrest.

      Obviously it’s better only to create jobs to serve a recurring demand.

Your comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Most read in the last 20 days:

  • Perversity: Thy Name is Dollar
    Perversity: Thy Name is Dollar If you ask most people, “what is money?” they will answer that money is the generally accepted medium of exchange. If you ask Google Images, it will show you many pictures of green pieces of paper. Virtually everyone agrees that money means the dollar.   Image credit: Cildo Meireles   Breaking Down the Dollar Monetary System What does it mean to have a dollar? If you hold a piece of paper with green ink on it, which says “ONE...
  • What’s In Your Loan?
      Opposing Monetary Directions “Real estate is the future of the monetary system,” declares a real estate bug. Does this make any sense? We would ask him this. “OK how will houses be borrowed and lent?” “Look at this housing bond,” he says, pointing to a bond denominated in dollars, with principal and interest paid in dollars. “What do you mean ‘housing’ bond’,” we ask, “it’s a bond denominated in dollars!” “Yes, but housing is the...

Support Acting Man

Austrian Theory and Investment

Archive

THE GOLD CARTEL: Government Intervention on Gold, the Mega Bubble in Paper and What This Means for Your Future

Realtime Charts

 

Gold in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Gold in EUR:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Silver in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Platinum in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

USD - Index:

[Most Recent USD from www.kitco.com]

 

Mish Talk

     
    Buy Silver Now!
     
    Buy Gold Now!