ECB Cuts Rates From Nada to Zilch (and Less), Announces QE

In his Jackson Hole speech, Mario Draghi already hinted at further ECB interventions, pointing out that 5 year forward inflation breakevens indicated  that long term inflation expectations had fallen below 2% (i.e., 2% CPI rate of change). Consumers would of course see this as a reason to rejoice, but not our vaunted planners. It was already widely expected than an ABS purchase program would eventually be announced, as preparations for this have been underway for several  months.

Frankly, we thought that given that the TLTROs are beginning in September, the ECB would likely wait for their impact before announcing additional interventionist steps. As it turned out, they announced so many things at once on Thursday, they actually managed to surprise not only us, but apparently the great majority of market participants.

The announcement included: further rate cuts; with the repo rate now at 5 basis points, which we might as well call zero, this avenue is now rapidly closing. Since all rates were cut, they also increased the bizarre penalty rate on excess reserves to minus 20 basis points. All this measure achieves is that it costs the banks money. It's not going to make them more eager to lend, but it will lead to them cutting the paltry interest they pay to savers even further. So the war on savers is continuing at full blast.

 

As to these rate cuts, we would note that the central bank has been trying to “rescue” the economy with rate cuts for quite some time. It hasn't worked so far, but that is of course not stopping them from doing more of what hasn't worked.  This may be properly called “central planning insanity”. Even so, it is not clear to us why they believe another 10 basis points can possibly make a difference. Even if one erroneously thinks that economic growth can actually be spurred by monetary pumping, this appears to be an utterly futile gesture.

More surprising was that the ABS purchase program was announced concurrently, and along with it a covered bond purchase program. In his press conference Draghi promised a “substantial increase in the ECB's balance sheet”, which can actually be fairly easily achieved with this latter monetization initiative. Euro area covered bonds consist of two types, they are either backed by mortgage bonds, or by public sector debt securities (including agency debt). This is a big market, and there are very large covered bond programs out there, which can be used to add further to the already large supply of such bonds. Draghi pointed out that this will inject additional money directly into the economy.

Apparently the decision was not unanimous, and we can guess who the dissenters were (hint, the name of one of them starts with a “W”).

From experience we know that ECB refinancing operations do tend to lead to money supply growth acceleration in the short to medium term, and the combination of TLTROs and QE will surely have a noticeable effect with respect to that, unless the decline in private sector lending actually accelerates concurrently. For all the talk about “inflation being too low” (which is a totally absurd assertion anyway, since consumers can only benefit from the fact that prices are only rising slowly for a change), euro area-wide monetary inflation recently stood at 5.6% (narrow money supply). This is what we regard as the actual “inflation rate”.

 

euro-arera-TMS-1,M-1Monetary inflation in the euro area. Note the y/y growth rate in blue. Thank God our central planners are able to implement such long term stability! – click to enlarge.

 

Bowing to Mercantilism

There has been a lot of yammering by various Mercantilists in Europe about the allegedly “too strong euro” (government minions in France are usually especially vocal about this). A strong euro benefits consumers and countless businesses that buy goods and services from abroad, while a weak euro is solely to the strictly temporary benefit of a small group of exporters. In other words, the idea is to help a small sector of the economy for a limited period, in exchange for hurting a much larger sector of the economy permanently. Brilliant.

Naturally, this is part for the course for our modern-day economic planners. They have evidently learned nothing in the past 450 or so years.  Why anyone would think it actually makes economic sense to weaken the euro is completely beyond us. Not a single nation on the planet has ever, in all of history, devalued itself to prosperity. The belief that this is possible is simply idiotic, not to put too fine a point to it. However, what can one conclude from the ECB's actions but that it wants to weaken the euro? Note here that Draghi has actually joined the chorus of complainers about the euro's strength around June already, so it appears he agrees that one can devalue oneself to prosperity. Anyway, it appears market participants were duly surprised by the announcement and decided to sell the already extremely oversold euro further. However, this move seems very long in the tooth by now, at least in the short term:

 

EuroNote the gaps in this chart –  a break-away gap at the beginning of the move lower, and now there could be an exhaustion gap in evidence.  The euro has only twice been this oversold on a daily basis: when it crashed in the fall of 2008, and now – click to enlarge.

 

It should also be pointed out that speculators currently hold the second largest short position in euro futures in the currency's history. Amazingly, this 200,000 contract position (which is quite chunky in notional terms) is approaching the all time high net short position speculators held back in 2011/12, when the very survival of the euro appeared to be in doubt. The chart below shows the net long position of commercial hedgers, i.e., the obverse of the speculative net short position.

 

Euro-hedgers

Speculation against the euro has become extreme.

 

The fact that the euro was in danger of breaking up a mere two years ago makes it especially strange that anyone in an official position would want to weaken it. Should they not be glad it has found willing buyers and holders again?

 

“Price Stability”

Lastly we want to briefly comment a bit more on the ECB's so-called “price stability” policy. First of all, this mandate implies that monetary inflation will go into overdrive every time the imaginary “general price level” isn't reflecting a devaluation of the currency's purchasing power by at least 2% per year. This naturally invites all the consequences a sharply rising money supply brings about.

While in the short term, an illusion of prosperity can be created, in reality real wealth will be redistributed, capital will be malinvested and increasingly consumed, and the economy will weaken on a structural level. It is not possible to lastingly increase society-wide prosperity by printing money.  Even if all the negative effects of monetary inflation did not exist, not one iota of real wealth could be brought into existence by printing more money.

However, what strikes us as especially irksome is that Draghi, similar to other monetary central planners, feigns concern with the unemployed and other victims of the last bubble the ECB aided and abetted with loose monetary policy. If they are all so concerned, then why are they deliberately taking steps that are aimed at debasing the currency?  When people struggle in difficult economic times, it seems especially important that their money should retain its exchange value. Making it worth less will only add to their troubles.

Such a policy can only be justified if one indeed assumes that money printing makes the economy “better”. In that case one not only needs to consciously reject sound monetary and economic theory, but must also cavalierly gloss over about 2,000 years of history, which show quite clearly that such policies have failed over and over again. Some of this history is fairly recent to boot.

 

Conclusion

After the last major inflationary push by the ECB (the LTROs of 2011/12), a brief surge in money supply growth triggered a temporary and evidently illusory spurt in economic activity. This Potemkin village quickly crumbled again, the very moment money supply growth declined back toward 5% y/y. The measures announced this Thursday may well achieve a similar Pyrrhic victory – but what then? Indeed, what Pyrrhus of Epirus is said to have remarked in the context of his victorious battles against the Romans can probably be applied in this context as well.

One only needs to adjust his saying a bit:

“If we are victorious in one more battle with the faltering recovery, we shall be utterly ruined”.

 

draghis-bazooka

 

 
Charts by: StockCharts, Sentimentrader, ECB
 
 

 

Emigrate While You Can... Learn More

 


 

 
 

Dear Readers!

You may have noticed that our so-called “semiannual” funding drive, which started sometime in the summer if memory serves, has seamlessly segued into the winter. In fact, the year is almost over! We assure you this is not merely evidence of our chutzpa; rather, it is indicative of the fact that ad income still needs to be supplemented in order to support upkeep of the site. Naturally, the traditional benefits that can be spontaneously triggered by donations to this site remain operative regardless of the season - ranging from a boost to general well-being/happiness (inter alia featuring improved sleep & appetite), children including you in their songs, up to the likely allotment of privileges in the afterlife, etc., etc., but the Christmas season is probably an especially propitious time to cross our palms with silver. A special thank you to all readers who have already chipped in, your generosity is greatly appreciated. Regardless of that, we are honored by everybody's readership and hope we have managed to add a little value to your life.

   

Bitcoin address: 12vB2LeWQNjWh59tyfWw23ySqJ9kTfJifA

   
 

11 Responses to “Draghi’s War on Savers and the Euro”

  • HitTheFan:

    No.6

    Keep looking, it’s within a protocol document governing ECB monetary operation rules.
    Draghi has referenced it specifically quite recently, in May.
    Rest assured, the ECB will not bail out govts, and will fail a load of banks, it will be well prepared.

    • No6:

      But the ECB has already bailed out governments and banks.

      • HitTheFan:

        Yes, banks received temporary liquidity during the credit crunch from the ECB.
        To my knowledge no govt has received any money from the ECB, only from the so-called troika of the EU, IMF and member states.
        Any govt bonds bought by the ECB in its monetary ops have Ben re-sold.

        But look at Cyprus, and look at the preparations for bank supervision and resolution. It is clear to me that the Ecb will be failing plenty of banks in the next downturn.

        I don’t ever expect it to do sovereign QE, because it is illegal, and also because there is another non- debt asset it is empowered to buy that works much better.

        Also, in a post USD world, the ECB will target hicp at 0%. No need for inflation.

        If you have time and an open mind, read this thread, it’s very long, but contains information that many have never even considered….

        http://neuralnetwriter.cylo42.com/node/4014

        • No6:

          Yes, but the bailed out banks bought the sovereign bonds of otherwise insolvent governments.

          Now the ECB is buying toxic mortgage junk from the banks at face value. That is a bailout.

          I agree on the eventual demise of the USD reserve currency, and the need for hard assets in the coming purge. I am not so sure that the ECB will start to swap these piles of credit units for physical Gold but I sure hope they do.

          • rodney:

            Wow! … That some people cannot see this simple trick of indirect ECB sovereign bailouts while telling you to keep an open mind, as if you were the biased one, makes you wonder about the stuff between their ears … Ignore.

  • No6:

    ARTICLE 104 Maastricht Treaty.

    1. Overdraft facilities or any other type of credit facility with the ECB or with the

    central banks of the Member States (hereinafter referred to as ‘national central banks’)

    in favour of Community institutions or bodies, central governments, regional, local or

    other public authorities, other bodies governed by public law, or public undertakings of

    Member States shall be prohibited, as shall the purchase directly from them by the ECB

    or national central banks of debt instruments.

  • HitTheFan:

    Apologies, I rarely use my IPad, it has such an annoying auto spell function.
    Govts not goats!
    :)

  • HitTheFan:

    ‘It is not possible to lastingly increase society-wide prosperity by printing money.’

    Would that not depend on what the central bank buys with that money?
    Have you not checked the Maastricht Treaty articles?
    I doubt it, even though Graghi and other board members have referenced the specific section several times.
    Go check to out, remember they’re not allayed to finance goats, and you’ll be drawn the only asset remaining that they are authorised to buy outright.

    And by the way, you must be absolutely blind if you think the ECB is bailing out banks. They are rubbing their hands together, itching to fail dozens of crap banks. They say so all the time.
    Ditch your prejudices, enjoy the show. Not long to wait.

  • rodney:

    Agree with clarapunk, the whole thing smacks of a desperate attempt to prevent something really awful coming their way; smells fishy …

  • No6:

    A Bank/Government bailout at every Euro holders expense, all under the cover of helping the unemployed and the poor. Magnificent.

  • In my opinion, the ECB just lies when says they want to help ordinary people. I think the real ECB worries are about bank capital. As you said in the other post, it could be that the tests being carried out weren´t giving nice results. If that is the case and with an european economy stalling, I think Draghi is worried about another round of lack of credit flow between banks ala 2008 and is trying to recapitalize banks as quickly as possible. And as a side effect it is going to get some credit, probably, to the real economy and a Euro decline. All in just one movement. For sure, right now Draghi thinks of himself that he is really a smart guy. What a joke

Your comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Most read in the last 20 days:

  • No results available

Support Acting Man

Item Guides

Austrian Theory and Investment

j9TJzzN

The Review Insider

Archive

Dog Blow

350x200

THE GOLD CARTEL: Government Intervention on Gold, the Mega Bubble in Paper and What This Means for Your Future

Realtime Charts

 

Gold in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Gold in EUR:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Silver in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Platinum in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

USD - Index:

[Most Recent USD from www.kitco.com]

 

Mish Talk

 
Buy Silver Now!
 
Buy Gold Now!
 

Diary of a Rogue Economist