The Blessings of Political Competition

In the US, it is frequently demonstrated why political competition is so much better than the 'tax harmonization' and similar centralization plans pursued by the socialist bureaucrats of the EU.

A recent example is provided by the fact that Toyota has just decided to fold its tent in high-tax, high regulation California in order move to the far friendlier business climes of Texas. And it is not the only company that has come to this decision:


“Toyota Motor Corp. is moving substantial parts of its U.S. headquarters in Torrance, California, to suburban Dallasas the world’s largest automaker seeks savings from its U.S. sales unit, people familiar with the matter said.

Employees will be informed of the plan today, said the people, who asked not to be identified disclosing private conversations. Steve Curtis, a Toyota spokesman, didn’t return a call on the matter.

The surprise move is a blow to the Golden State, the biggest U.S. auto market and proponent of the strictest clean-air rules. Toyota’s Prius hybrid has been California’s top-selling model for the past two years and helped secure a leading 22 percent market share. It also represents a victory for Texas Governor Rick Perry, who’s made repeated visits to California to lure businesses to his state with promises of lower taxes and easier regulations.

“It would be very consequential for Southern California,” said Jack Nerad, executive market analyst for vehicle-price data service Kelley Blue Book inIrvine, California. “There might be some brain drain and tumult for employees, though it should be largely seamless to the consumer. This kind of thing can create some disruption of momentum.”


In February, Occidental Petroleum Corp. said it was splitting its operations, keeping a portion in California and setting up a new unit in Houston. Raytheon Co., a technology company that specializes in defense, last year moved its space and airborne systems unit to McKinney, Texas, from southern California.”


(emphasis added)

The news from Toyota are especially significant, considering it has been in California since 1957. California runs the risk of running into the very problem Margaret Thatcher famously associated with socialism: sooner or later, you run out of other people's money to pay for it. When said paying bodies can easily remove themselves to a nearby jurisdiction that treats them better, it happens all the more quickly.

Consider that California has introduced such inanities as a unilateral CO2 reduction plan that is absolutely certain not to alter “global warming” by one iota, even if the worst case apocalyptic AGW fantasies were to actually be true (which they are obviously not). Global human CO2 emissions will be reduced by 0.4% in the best case (which is like a pimple on a pimple on a pimple on an elephant's behind, since human CO2 emissions produced globally represent only 5.25% of all CO2 the planet produces every year. So global CO2 output will actually be lowered by 0.0021%, or about a quarter of a middling volcano belch) – at an estimated total cost to the economy of $450 billion by 2020, measured in constant 2012 dollars. California's citizens are going to be accordingly poorer – in service of a complete mirage.

California is also well known for being a state that is – apart from property taxes which have been frozen by a referendum – charging its citizens extremely high sales and income taxes, which when added to the federal tax burden reach truly punitive levels. Just to illustrate the effect  – not for Toyota the company, which will save a small fortune –  consider that some of Toyota's employees who decide to move with Toyota to Texas will save one million dollars in taxes and in many cases even more over their working lives.  A few examples via Forbes:


“Toyota’s move from California to Texas is big news. Considering the high cost of operating in the Golden State, Toyota will save big. Still, many Toyota employees moving from California to Texas stand to reap big tax savings themselves. In fact, the National Center for Policy Analysis says that its State Tax Calculator shows it’s not just thousands.

For some workers, it could be more than a million dollars in tax savings over their lifetimes, says the study. Here are some examples the National Center for Policy Analysis produced: a 30-year old single California renter earning $75,000 annually and could gain an additional $14,909 in discretionary income by moving to Texas; if saved and invested this would amount to $1,513,727 over her lifetime.

That’s a pretty impressive tally, pumped up by the assumed savings. Another example: a 30-year old single earning $100,000 a year in California could gain an additional $14,653 a year in discretionary income, and $1,487,723 over her lifetime. Finally, the figures say 40-year old married California homeowners earning $150,000 a year could gain an additional $2,535 a year in discretionary income, and more than $209,000 over their lifetime.

The State Tax Calculator is free from the National Center for Policy Analysis. The NCPA notes that it computes the difference in the federal and state income taxes, property taxes and sales taxes one can expect to pay over the rest of your life when you move from one state to another.”


(emphasis added)

So why is this a good thing? It is very simple really – although initially, the burden on those remaining in California will increase even further, Texas (and other low tax/low regulation states) are setting an example and putting ever greater pressure on high tax states like California. High tax states will eventually be forced to follow this example if they want to avoid terminal economic decline. This type of tax and regulatory competition is definitely of great long term advantage to all citizens, who will in the end get to keep far more of their hard-earned money, while less is left for the political and bureaucratic classes to waste. What's not to like?


Toyota-Headquarters-Torrance-California-2Toyota's HQ in Torrance, California is about to dematerialze and will shortly thereafter  rematerialize in Texas, where the company and its employees both stand to save a pretty bundle.

(Photo via / Author unknown)




Emigrate While You Can... Learn More




Dear Readers!

You may have noticed that our so-called “semiannual” funding drive, which started sometime in the summer if memory serves, has seamlessly segued into the winter. In fact, the year is almost over! We assure you this is not merely evidence of our chutzpa; rather, it is indicative of the fact that ad income still needs to be supplemented in order to support upkeep of the site. Naturally, the traditional benefits that can be spontaneously triggered by donations to this site remain operative regardless of the season - ranging from a boost to general well-being/happiness (inter alia featuring improved sleep & appetite), children including you in their songs, up to the likely allotment of privileges in the afterlife, etc., etc., but the Christmas season is probably an especially propitious time to cross our palms with silver. A special thank you to all readers who have already chipped in, your generosity is greatly appreciated. Regardless of that, we are honored by everybody's readership and hope we have managed to add a little value to your life.


Bitcoin address: 12vB2LeWQNjWh59tyfWw23ySqJ9kTfJifA


6 Responses to “Toyota Waves Good-Bye to Taxifornia”

  • ramblarou:

    Not exactly a triump of free market capitalism. Just one corporate state buying jobs from another corporate state at the taxpayers expense. Seems Texas overpaid Toyota by giving them $10’000 plus ongoing tax abatements per job transfered, much higher than the going rate, in order to gain some temporary political capital. I see no need for triumphonism just because Texas spends even more money on political vanity corporate welfare than a bankrupt California. Do a little more reasearch next time rather than acting as a cheap corporate state shill!

  • No6:

    It seems Arnold Schwarzenegger didn’t have the balls or the muscle to make the necessary changes.

  • AustrianJim:

    Incredible that more companies aren’t making the move out of CA.

  • zerobs:

    a 30-year old single earning $100,000 a year in California could gain an additional $14,653 a year in discretionary income, and $1,487,723 over her lifetime.

    Of course, as Texas gain more ex-California residents, they also gain for ex-California voters who will vote for the same idiotic political ideologies in Texas that ruined California. (But it’ll take 40 years and by then the 30-year old transplant will have retired.)

    • rodney:

      Very true … Texas could insure against that outcome by issuing gold and silver coins and allowing them to circulate as legal tender. Ron Paul has argued that it is a constitutional for the states to do so.

      Once hard money is in play, politicians cannot run the deficits that enable the idiotic policies you mention.

    • zerobs, you hit it on the head. I happen to live in Plano and McKinney is the county seat. Hopefully those making a decision take a look and hate the place and stay in California. Plano is the highest per capita income city in the US over a certain population, I suspect 200,000 or 250,000. It has the lowest crime rate. We don’t lack for big spenders though. Hopefully those that come will bring the lessons learned in CA and stand with the conservatives here.

      One thing about Collin County is housing is still cheap. We lost a lot of supply during the housing bust and due to growth in the area, it is in tight supply. Those coming from California, which is in another bubble, should bring plenty of money with them and bid up the prices. One problem we have here is water, which, if not remedied, will eventually bring building restrictions. The well located property is filling up.

Your comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Most read in the last 20 days:

  • As the Madness Turns
      A Growing Gap The first quarter of 2019 is over and done.  But before we say good riddance.  Some reflection is in order.  To this we offer two discrete metrics.  Gross domestic product and government debt.   US nominal GDP vs total federal debt (in millions of USD) – government debt has exceeded  total economic output for the first time in Q4 2012 and since then its relative growth trajectory has increased – and it seems the gap is set to widen further....
  • Bitcoin Jumps as Ordered -  Precious Metals Supply and Demand
      Digital Asset Rush The only part of our April Fools article yesterday that was not said with tongue firmly planted in cheek was the gold and silver price action (though framed it in the common dollar-centric parlance, being April Fools):   “Gold went down $21, while silver dropped about 1/3 of a dollar. Not quite a heavy metal brick in free fall, but close enough.”   Bitcoin, hourly – a sudden yen for BTC breaks out among the punters. [PT]   It also...
  • A Trip Down Memory Lane – 1928-1929 vs. 2018-2019
      Boom Times Compared It has become abundantly clear by now that the late 2018 swoon was not yet the beginning of the end of the stock market bubble – at least not right away. While money supply growth continues to decelerate, the technical underpinnings of the rally from the late December low were actually quite strong – in particular, new highs in the cumulative NYSE A/D line indicate that it was broad-based.   Cumulative NYSE A/D line vs. SPX – normally the A/D line...
  • Debt Growth and Capital Consumption - Precious Metals Supply and Demand
      A Worrisome Trend If you read gold analysis much, you will come across two ideas. One, inflation so-called (rising consumer prices) is not only running much higher than the official statistic, but is about to really start skyrocketing. Two, buy gold because gold will hedge it. That is, the price of gold will go up as fast, or faster, than the price of gold.   CPI monthly since 1914, annualized rate of change. In recent years CPI was relatively tame despite a vast increase in the...
  • Unsolicited Advice to Fed Chair Powell
      Unsolicited Advice to Fed Chair Powell American businesses over the past decade have taken a most unsettling turn.  According to research from the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, as of November 2018, non-financial corporate debt has grown to more than $9.1 trillion [ed note: this number refers to securitized debt and business loans, other corporate liabilities would add an additional $11 trillion for a total of $20.5 trillion].   US non-financial corporate...
  • Long Term Stock Market Sentiment Remains as Lopsided as Ever 
      Investors are Oblivious to the Market's Downside Potential This is a brief update on a number of sentiment/positioning indicators we have frequently discussed in these pages in the past. In this missive our focus is exclusively on indicators that are of medium to long-term relevance to prospective stock market returns. Such indicators are not really useful for the purpose of market timing -  instead they are telling us something about the likely duration and severity of the bust that...
  • The Effect of Earnings Season on Seasonal Price Patterns
      Earnings Lottery Shareholders are are probably asking themselves every quarter how the earnings of companies in their portfolios will turn out. Whether they will beat or miss analyst expectations often seems akin to a lottery.   The beatings will continue until morale improves... [PT]   However, what is not akin to a lottery are the seasonal trends of corporate earnings and stock prices. Thus breweries will usually report stronger quarterly earnings after the...
  • The Liquidity Drought Gets Worse
      Money Supply Growth Continues to Falter Ostensibly the stock market has rallied because the Fed promised to maintain an easy monetary policy. To be sure, interest rate hikes have been put on hold for the time being and the balance sheet contraction (a.k.a.“quantitative tightening”) will be terminated much earlier than originally envisaged. And yet, the year-on-year growth rate of the true broad money supply keeps declining noticeably.   The year-on-year growth rates of...
  • The Gold-Silver Ratio Continues to Rise - Precious Metals Supply and Demand
      Is Silver Hard of Hearing? The price of gold inched down, but the price of silver footed down (if we may be permitted a little humor that may not make sense to metric system people). For the gold-silver ratio to be this high, it means one of two things. It could be that speculators are avoiding the monetary metals and metal stackers are depressed. Or that something is going on in the economy, to drive demand for the metals in different directions.   As a rule the gold silver...
  • What Were They Thinking?
      Learning From Other People's Mistakes is Cheaper One benefit of hindsight is that it imparts a cheap superiority over the past blunders of others.  We certainly make more mistakes than we’d care to admit.  Why not look down our nose and acquire some lessons learned from the mistakes of others?   Bitcoin, weekly. The late 2017 peak is completely obvious in hindsight... [PT]   A simple record of the collective delusions from the past can be quickly garnered from...

Support Acting Man

Item Guides

Austrian Theory and Investment


The Review Insider


Dog Blow


THE GOLD CARTEL: Government Intervention on Gold, the Mega Bubble in Paper and What This Means for Your Future

Realtime Charts


Gold in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from]



Gold in EUR:

[Most Recent Quotes from]



Silver in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from]



Platinum in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from]



USD - Index:

[Most Recent USD from]


Mish Talk

Buy Silver Now!
Buy Gold Now!