The Fed's Big Lie

Let's see what Larry Summers has to say. We always appreciate Summers. His mind is razor-sharp – always cutting straight to the wrong conclusion.

"Why stagnation might prove to be the new normal," is the headline of his piece in Monday's Financial Times. Summers has done it again. Whatever may be said about today's cockeyed economies, there is nothing "normal" about them.

What's normal about a government that runs up as much debt as it had in World War II – with no war… no national emergency… and no way to pay the money back? What's normal about an economy that depends on the lowest interest rates in three generations … and a central bank that holds them down like a crooked butcher with his finger on the meat scale?

And what's normal about an advanced capitalist country where the typical man earns less than he did 43 years ago? Alright… let's give Summers a chance …


It might be the "new normal" because the Fed's tools – EZ money wrenches and interest rate hammers – no longer fix an economy, he says. At best, they "drive only moderate growth." And even an interest rate of zero isn't adequate "to spur enough investment to lead to full employment."

You're caught, in other words, in the trap you laid yourself! When they get in that situation, consumers and investors see prices falling and they decide to sit tight. Why buy now when you can get more for less later?


'Look at Japan'

"Look at Japan," suggests Summers. After its bubble burst in 1990, growth over the next five years was stronger than in the US following the busted bubble of 2008. Then, instead of returning to a booming economy, Japan remained in an on-again, off-again deflationary slump.

Yes – several times it appeared that the Japanese economy had reached "escape velocity." And each time it quickly fell back to Earth. Why couldn't the Japanese feds – who did just about everything the US feds have done – get their economy to pick up some speed? Nobody really knows.

Summers suggests it may be a combination of things… which now affects the US economy as well as Japan.First, the labor force is growing more slowly than before.

Second, productivity growth is harder to come by. Third, consumption may be declining "due to a sharp increase in the share of income held by the very wealthy and the rising share of income accruing to capital."

Unlike the poor, rich people do not upgrade their living standards when they earn more money. They are already enjoying the lifestyles they want; more money is merely saved or invested in other projects.

Uncharacteristically, Summers offers no solution to this morass. He merely tells us that "secular stagnation should be viewed as a contingency to be insured against – not a fate to which we ought to be resigned." How do we protect ourselves?

"Pre-empting structural stagnation is so profoundly important," he argues, because the standard treatment for it – EZ money – drives "investors to take greater risks, making bubbles more likely."


How to Stop the Stagnation

Summers offers more insights into why the US may face a Japanese-style slump, but misses the only one that really explains it. Let's see …

The Japanese bubble burst. The Japanese feds came to the rescue with the typical tricks and treatments of modern macroeconomic meddling. Result: a long stagnation. Go forward 18 years. The US bubble burst. The US feds came to the rescue… again, with the typical tricks and treatments of modern macroeconomic management.

In Japan as in the US, the authorities, bailed, bullied and boondoggled their way to a makeshift "stability." In each country, they avoided a quick, painful correction. Banks and other companies that should have gone broke were saved. Investments that should have gone belly-up were spared. The rich – at least in the US – who should have seen their wealth substantially reduced, got even richer.

And both countries got a long period of stagnation. It has gone on for 23 years in Japan. In the US, we will soon enter our seventh year of slumpy, crisis-prone 'recovery.' Want to stop the stagnation?

Easy-peasy. Just stop meddling.



The above article is from Diary of a Rogue Economist originally written for Bonner & Partners.

Bill Bonner founded Agora, Inc in 1978. It has since grown into one of the largest independent newsletter publishing companies in the world. He has also written three New York Times bestselling books, Financial Reckoning Day, Empire of Debt and Mobs, Messiahs and Markets.




Emigrate While You Can... Learn More




Dear Readers!

You may have noticed that our so-called “semiannual” funding drive, which started sometime in the summer if memory serves, has seamlessly segued into the winter. In fact, the year is almost over! We assure you this is not merely evidence of our chutzpa; rather, it is indicative of the fact that ad income still needs to be supplemented in order to support upkeep of the site. Naturally, the traditional benefits that can be spontaneously triggered by donations to this site remain operative regardless of the season - ranging from a boost to general well-being/happiness (inter alia featuring improved sleep & appetite), children including you in their songs, up to the likely allotment of privileges in the afterlife, etc., etc., but the Christmas season is probably an especially propitious time to cross our palms with silver. A special thank you to all readers who have already chipped in, your generosity is greatly appreciated. Regardless of that, we are honored by everybody's readership and hope we have managed to add a little value to your life.


Bitcoin address: 12vB2LeWQNjWh59tyfWw23ySqJ9kTfJifA


4 Responses to “The Fed’s Big Lie”

  • Viator:

    That is hair raising comment Andrew Judd. You think there is not a vacuum caused by the smothering of capitalism (spontaneous order) by statism and central planning into which crony capitalism, even more statism, and fascism are rapidly deploying?

    You could start here to educate yourself:

    • rodney:

      Excellent stuff, Viator!

      Andrew might need to allow this possibility in his mind:

      There is no greater example of the hubris of the constructivist than in this failure to envisage order in a natural process (which is not of a directly physical kind). As Hayek says in “Principles of a Liberal Social Order”:

      Much of the opposition to a system of freedom under general laws arises from the inability to conceive of an effective co-ordination of human activities without deliberate organization by a commanding intelligence. One of the achievements of economic theory has been to explain how such a mutual adjustment of the spontaneous activities of individuals is brought about by the market, provided that there is a known delimitation of the sphere of control of each individual.

    • Andrew Judd:

      The relevant issue is how do you avoid the strongman taking over, even while he may not appear for decades?

  • Andrew Judd:

    I really cannot relate to the libertarian idea that if governments stop meddling that people will not be meddling. When i imagine governments falling i see a vacuum into which people enter. When i see a government i see people. Therefore I see these liberatarian ideas as utopian. In this utopia people are different and do not meddle, nobody becomes the strongman. Somehow in the idea people peacefully coexist not just for a few years but for decades.

    OK so I imagine what would happen in our credit based world where one persons savings are another persons spending power and the government stops meddling and i am in reality living in a supposedly productive economy like Finland. Who is going to be able to afford our products?? So fairly quickly we will have massive unemployment and people hungry. We will have our little vacuum and we would have to migrate to where we could get food and somehow when we arrive say in the south of France they are going to be able to welcome us and feed us? No? how about we migrate to central Africa? Or do we just wait here in the snow to die so that other economies with food are not under any pressure and they can manage?

    How actually does it work in this Utupia? presumably there are books and theories and explanations of the model on how productive countries in cold climates that rely on food imports will survive when the governments stop meddling? Or in fact does nobody even think about it at all??

Your comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Most read in the last 20 days:

  • India’s Experiments with COVID-19
      Shooting from the Hip [ed. note: the tweets linked below mainly show videos from various lockdown phases]   Reminiscent of his demonetization effort in 2016, on 24th March 2020, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, appeared on TV and declared an immediate nationwide curfew. No one was to be allowed to leave wherever he or she happened to be. All flights, trains (after 167 years of continual operation) and road transportation came to a complete, shrieking...

Support Acting Man

Austrian Theory and Investment


The Review Insider


Dog Blow

THE GOLD CARTEL: Government Intervention on Gold, the Mega Bubble in Paper and What This Means for Your Future

Realtime Charts


Gold in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from]



Gold in EUR:

[Most Recent Quotes from]



Silver in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from]



Platinum in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from]



USD - Index:

[Most Recent USD from]


Mish Talk

    Buy Silver Now!
    Buy Gold Now!