It Was to Be Expected …


As we have frequently pointed out in past articles on Bitcoin, the biggest danger to the currency was always government. The currency challenges the State's money monopoly, even though it does so only in a minor way so far, and even central banks have taken notice. As we pointed out in a previous post, the ECB for instance worries that 'Bitcoin may undermine confidence in central banks' (in this article we have listed all the reasons why one should expect governments to attempt to crush the currency). In other words, Bitcoin is seen as unwanted competition by the money monopolists.

It started out with a concerted attack by the handmaidens of the State, the banking cartel, on the viability of Bitcoin exchanges (which incidentally reminds us a bit of the recent attacks on gold). Many banks simply closed down the accounts Bitcoin exchanges held with them, which linked Bitcoin trades to other currencies. As far as we're aware, in most cases no reasons were supplied as to why these accounts were closed down – it wasn't necessary to supply them. Everybody knows what it's about, so making up spurious reasons would only expose the banks concerned to ridicule.


Now the 'Department of Homeland Security' has struck against Bitcoin – something we long expected to happen (as an aside, we continue to be astonished that the political elite has chosen such a  Nazi-sounding name for this department. It goes to show how little effort they are making these days to conceal the true nature of government. They don't expect the sheep to care, and they are mostly right).


“Department of Homeland Security officials have reportedly seized an account used to handle bitcoin payments in the U.S. for Japan-based Mt. Gox, which claims to be the largest exchange for the electronic currency.

Gawker reported late Tuesday that the DHS had obtained a warrant from a federal judge to seize the account at Dwolla, a mobile payment processor based in Des Moines, Iowa.

Mt. Gox issued a statement Wednesday saying it was aware of media reports about the action, but that it hadn’t received a copy of the court order or warrant. The affidavit in support of the warrant cited probable cause to believe that the account was used to violate federal laws against unlicensed money transmitting businesses.

Bitcoins were quoted at $114 in recent action on the exchange. Trading activity in bitcoins surged earlier this year as the crisis in Cyprus intensified.”


(emphasis added)

See how easy it is for the State to declare any activity it doesn't like criminal? The jungle of administrative law that covers much of what is left of a once free society allows the government to target anyone at anytime it wishes. Since ignorance of the law is no valid legal defense, citizens are presumably supposed to know all the ins and outs of the blanket of prohibitions that covers every nook and cranny of life these days.


Is Bitcoin 'Money' After All?

One cannot transmit money without a 'license' apparently. One has to be part of a licensed industry cartel to be allowed to do that. However, does that mean that the government now acknowledges that Bitcoin is actually money?

There are legitimate doubts as to Bitcoin's 'moneyness'. We plan to address the question of how Bitcoin ties in with monetary theory in a separate article soon. Our assessment differs slightly in some aspects from that presented by Keith in an earlier article on the topic.

In any case, it is noteworthy that governments and the banking cartel are apparently getting worried about the crypto-currency. It is of course no coincidence that trading in Bitcoin soared after the Cyprus deposit confiscation – some people are trying to flee the system for what they regard as safer alternatives. Hence the recent full court press against both gold and Bitcoin: the establishment wants to eradicate such ideas before they take root. There is no escape is the message, and the system is 'totally safe'.

As Irish finance minister Noonan for instance declared: "There was general agreement that deposits below €100,000 in any resolution will be sacrosanct."

However, that does not alter the fact that the fractionally reserved banks simply don't have the money. As we have pointed out several times, 'uncovered' money substitutes in the euro area amount to more than € 3.5 trillion. In the US, they amount to more than $6.4 trillion. Again, this is money due to depositors on demand that is in fact not covered by bank reserves (either in the form of vault cash or bank deposits with the central bank). It is money the banks have literally created 'from thin air'. Therefore Noonan's promise is standing on very shaky ground indeed. It is true that many people are apathetic and remain unaware of these facts and of the risks they are exposed to. Rising prices of gold and Bitcoin raise their awareness, hence the authorities and the banking cartel are trying to put their foot down. Meanwhile, in spite of the attacks, Bitcoin's price has remained fairly stable recently – in fact, it has recently been rising against the US dollar:




Bitcoin: stable with an upward bias since the April crash – via bitcoincharts –  click to enlarge.





Emigrate While You Can... Learn More




Dear Readers!

You may have noticed that our so-called “semiannual” funding drive, which started sometime in the summer if memory serves, has seamlessly segued into the winter. In fact, the year is almost over! We assure you this is not merely evidence of our chutzpa; rather, it is indicative of the fact that ad income still needs to be supplemented in order to support upkeep of the site. Naturally, the traditional benefits that can be spontaneously triggered by donations to this site remain operative regardless of the season - ranging from a boost to general well-being/happiness (inter alia featuring improved sleep & appetite), children including you in their songs, up to the likely allotment of privileges in the afterlife, etc., etc., but the Christmas season is probably an especially propitious time to cross our palms with silver. A special thank you to all readers who have already chipped in, your generosity is greatly appreciated. Regardless of that, we are honored by everybody's readership and hope we have managed to add a little value to your life.


Bitcoin address: 12vB2LeWQNjWh59tyfWw23ySqJ9kTfJifA


4 Responses to “The State Moves Against Bitcoin”

  • therooster:

    The government is correct to prevent gold and silver from being called dollars. It’s important to move toward a break in the debt paradigm. Dollars, even as a measure (as opposed to a currency) are very much like a “rubber ruler”. Precious metals should be coined by weight and adhere to market law. As for bitcom, it’s a centralized algorithm …… so need I say more ? Only precious metals provide the freedom of decentralized debt-free currency ….. along with the current information age age feature of instant global liquidity. Can it get better than debt-free, store of value with instant transferability ??? I doubt it. Keep it simple and don’;t think for a second that any government has the ability to swat flies (decentralization down to the individual) with a hammer. Impossible !

  • This lends credence to the idea of a legal fiction, in the name of JOHN DOE, as opposed to John Doe, otherwise known as a nom de guerre. Note you get nothing from the government in your real name, but in all caps. it is a legitimate question as to why they never address you in your proper name, though it appears so tinfoil. Government, in a constitutional Republic, operates elsewise, in war, under a different set of rules. It appears they are making more and more war rules as we go forward. The public is continually conditioned to buy these rules, under the rule of necessity. But, who is making war?

    My sentiment accordingly, as to why they selected such a NAZI name for the anti-terror organization? Have we progressed so far down the road of totalitarianism that there is no reason to hide the fact? 12USC95a allows them to regulate everything to do with money and declare enemies. This is despite the Constitution guarantees the right to contract and that the government itself should not infringe contract. It also prohibits titles of nobility, which is what a state chartered bank is. None of the rest of us can create money out of thin air, create liabilities that are impossible to pay off and receive the shield of the government in the process. Has our government been hijacked by a small elite or is it even more serious, a group interested in waging war and controlling the world?

  • Jim:

    Excluding the arguments for or against Bitcoin being money, the argument that this is a government move against Bitcoin ignores a few facts. FinCEN has always had regulations in place that made it mandatory for anyone engaged in “Money Transmission” be registered. They also defined any one in the business of exchanging Bitcoin for U.S. Currency (but not the other way around) as a money transmitter. When Mt. Gox’s shell corporation filed it’s paperwork it was asked specifically whether they were going to be exchanging funds into dollars on client demand they stated they would not. That was a untrue. The Feds bought Bitcoin via Mt. Gox and then cashed them in. When Mt. Gox, via their shell corporation, put the money into their Dwolla account, they were in violation of several long-standing Federal regs and the account was seized. In the meantime Bitcoin is rocking along and other exchanges are untouched. Most of the U.S. exchanges currently operating are fully registered and comply with all AML/KYC regs. It is obvious that FinCEN intends to treat Bitcoin like any other currency. If you are going to operate a Bitcoin exchange in the U.S. that is something you have to live with. That isn’t the same thing as attacking Bitcoin, though.

    • Keith Weiner:

      I agree with Jim re: the regulations. A similar case was Bernard von Nothaus and the “Liberty Dollar”. People often paint this as a government attack on silver coinage. There are many privately manufactured silver rounds, medallions, and bars. You just cannot call them by the name “dollar”.

      I do agree with Pater that the trend is clear, the government of the US and the other governments are becoming increasingly desperate to close of all escape routes. They will need exponentially more capital in the future. But I don’t think we are there quite yet, and I rather suspect that the Fed and the big banks do not regard Bitcoin as much of a threat just yet. It’s like Google looking at some voice recognition startup company. Sure, it could grow to become a threat. Right now, it’s not, and if you’re the 800 pound gorilla you can afford to be patient. Many times the startup will self-destruct. If not, you have time to take action later such as acquire it or develop your own technology.

Your comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Most read in the last 20 days:

  • Is the Canary in the Gold Mine Coming to Life Again?
      A Chirp from the Deep Level Mines Back in late 2015 and early 2016, we wrote about a leading indicator for gold stocks, namely the sub-sector of marginal - and hence highly leveraged to the gold price - South African gold stocks. Our example du jour at the time was Harmony Gold (HMY) (see “Marginal Producer Takes Off” and “The Canary in the Gold Mine” for the details).   Mining engineer equipped with bio-sensor Photo credit: Hulton Archive   As we write these...
  • Fed Credit and the US Money Supply – The Liquidity Drain Accelerates
      Federal Reserve Credit Contracts Further We last wrote in July about the beginning contraction in outstanding Fed credit, repatriation inflows, reverse repos, and commercial and industrial lending growth, and how the interplay between these drivers has affected the growth rate of the true broad US money supply TMS-2 (the details can be seen here: “The Liquidity Drain Becomes Serious” and “A Scramble for Capital”).   The Fed has clearly changed course under Jerome Powell...
  • The Gold Standard: Protector of Individual Liberty and Economic Prosperity
      A Piece of Paper Alone Cannot Secure Liberty The idea of a constitution and/or written legislation to secure individual rights so beloved by conservatives and among many libertarians has proven to be a myth. The US Constitution and all those that have been written and ratified in its wake throughout the world have done little to protect individual liberties or keep a check on State largesse.   Sound money vs. a piece of paper – which is the better guarantor of liberty?...
  • Fed President Kashkari Hears Voices – Are They Lying?
      Orchestrated Larceny The government continues its approach towards full meltdown. The stock market does too. But when it comes down to it, these are mere distractions from the bigger breakdown that is bearing down upon us.   Prosperity imbalance illustrated. The hoi-polloi may be getting restless. [PT]   Average working stiffs have little time or inclination to contemplate gibberish from the Fed. They are too worn out from running in place all day to make much...
  • Are Credit Spreads Still a Leading Indicator for the Stock Market?
      A Well-Established Tradition Seemingly out of the blue, equities suffered a few bad hair days recently. As regular readers know, we have long argued that one should expect corrections in the form of mini-crashes to strike with very little advance warning, due to issues related to market structure and the unique post “QE” environment. Credit spreads are traditionally a fairly reliable early warning indicator for stocks and the economy (and incidentally for gold as well). Here is a...
  • US Stocks and Bonds Get Clocked in Tandem
      A Surprise Rout in the Bond Market At the time of writing, the stock market is recovering from a fairly steep (by recent standards) intraday sell-off. We have no idea where it will close, but we would argue that even a recovery into the close won't alter the status of today's action – it is a typical warning shot. Here is what makes the sell-off unique:   30 year bond and 10-year note yields have broken out from a lengthy consolidation pattern. This has actually surprised us, as...
  • Switzerland, Model of Freedom & Wealth Moving East – Interviews with Claudio Grass
      Sarah Westall Interviews Claudio Grass Last month our friend Claudio Grass, roving Mises Institute Ambassador and a Switzerland-based investment advisor specializing in precious metals, was interviewed by Sarah Westall for her Business Game Changers channel.   Sarah Westall and Claudio Grass   There are two interviews, both of which are probably of interest to our readers. The first one focuses on Switzerland with its unique, well-developed system of  direct...
  • Choking On the Salt of Debt
      Life After ZIRP Roughly three years ago, after traversing between Los Angeles and San Francisco via the expansive San Joaquin Valley, we penned the article, Salting the Economy to Death.  At the time, the monetary order was approach peak ZIRP.   Our boy ZIRP has passed away. Mr. 2.2% effective has taken his place in the meantime. [PT]   We found the absurdity of zero bound interest rates to have parallels to the absurdity of hundreds upon hundreds of miles of...
  • Exaggerated Economic Growth of the Third World
      Exciting Visions of a Bright Future Fund Managers, economists and politicians agree on the exciting future they see in the Third World. According to them, the engine of the world’s economic growth has moved from the West to what were once the poverty-stricken societies of the Third World. They feel mushy about the rapid increase in the size of the Middle Class in the Third World, and how poverty is becoming history.   GDP of India vs. UK in 2016 – crossing...
  • How Dangerous is the Month of October?
      A Month with a Bad Reputation A certain degree of nervousness tends to suffuse global financial markets when the month of October approaches. The memories of sharp slumps that happened in this month in the past – often wiping out the profits of an entire year in a single day – are apt to induce fear. However, if one disregards outliers such as 1987 or 2008, October generally delivers an acceptable performance.   The road to October... not much happens at first - until it...
  • Yield Curve Compression - Precious Metals Supply and Demand
      Hammering the Spread The price of gold fell nine bucks last week. However, the price of silver shot up 33 cents. Our central planners of credit (i.e., the Fed) raised short-term interest rates, and threatened to do it again in December. Meanwhile, the stock market continues to act as if investors do not understand the concepts of marginal debtor, zombie corporation, and net present value.   The Federal Reserve – carefully inching forward to Bustville   People...
  • Miraculous Credit Spreads - Precious Metals Supply and Demand
      Running From “Risk-Free” to Not So Risk-Free Debt  The price of gold blipped $13 last week, while the price of silver was unchanged. Speaking of interest rates and central planning by central banks, we note that in mid-2016, a correction (counter-trend move to the main trend) began in 10-year bond yields.   10-year treasury note yield vs. 10-year German Bund yield over the past decade [PT]   It occurred at the same time in the Swiss government bond and the...

Support Acting Man

Item Guides

Austrian Theory and Investment


The Review Insider


Dog Blow


THE GOLD CARTEL: Government Intervention on Gold, the Mega Bubble in Paper and What This Means for Your Future

Realtime Charts


Gold in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from]



Gold in EUR:

[Most Recent Quotes from]



Silver in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from]



Platinum in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from]



USD - Index:

[Most Recent USD from]


Mish Talk

Buy Silver Now!
Buy Gold Now!